One cycle ends as another cycle beings

The program of White genocide is coming to an end.  There’s nothing the anti-Whites can do except present and frame pro-Whites in the worst light possible. All they can do is attack the messenger and this only buys them time. It’s over for the anti-Whites.  The low to mid-level anti-Whites who spread anti-White hate in the universities and media are close to seeing their worlds being turned upside down. The high level globalists who orchestrated White genocide to help bring forth global government are not only facing the consequences of trying to push White genocide, they’re also getting hit geopolitically and financially by all the other people in the world that they pissed off over the years.

My concern at this point is over what will come next. Bob Whitaker has presented the idea of suing the hell out of the people and organizations that had participated and benefited from White genocide. I wholeheartedly support this idea and believe the money gained from such a campaign should be used to help create a brighter future for White children.   At some point ideas will have to be discussed for the legal-spatial realities involved in ending White genocide. In the United States, at the very least, freedom of association will need to be re-implemented.  In Europe major parts of countries will be set aside exclusively to ensure the long term survival and amelioration of the traditional populations.  In America Whites should move to rural areas and repopulate the small towns and farming communities that emptied after WWII.  These issues will have to be addressed, but I’m still thinking beyond this. I’m thinking about higher purposes (1).

Once White genocide is stamped out and survival is ensured for the foreseeable future, the next phase will be the amelioration of the folk.  This phase will require institutions and individuals to create a “Renaissance” of sorts that will span across the White Western world.  There will need to be new media organs on par with the major cable news stations, mainstream newspapers, radio, and internet outlets.  There will need to be universities/colleges created following the model of other identitarian universities (Black, Jewish, Christian, Catholic, Mormon, etc).  In the beginning these institutions of higher learning should focus on the liberal arts and fine arts.  These Universities would offer a pro-White atmosphere and curriculum just as Brandeis University offers a pro-Jewish or BYU offers a pro- Mormon atmosphere and curriculum.  Later a pro-White Law school should be created and eventually a research university.

I must also emphasize the importance of the arts in this White Renaissance.  I’ve said this in the past and it must be said again and again that the power of art is near infinite. We need movies, shows, music, paintings, sculptures, poetry, comic books, architecture, etc. to give the folk a vision of the divine state that we wish to attain.  Art is like gasoline on the fire of the imagination.  Whites must also organize to improve the state of the world. Organizations of White men and woman should be taking on huge environmental issues like cleaning the pacific garbage patch. On the local level we should clean up public areas, plant trees, and take part in beautification efforts.  When the world hears that the Whites are taking on a world class problem, there should be feelings of relief worldwide. Commercially pro-Whites should enter the agricultural sector and directly compete with the big agro-businesses.  The same way Indians from India are highly concentrated in motels and corner gas stations pro-Whites should “cultivate” a large presence in organic and non-GMO farming and ranching.  Racially conscious Whites should look to concentrate into strategic industries that produce tangible goods and services:  agriculture, water treatment, medicine, communications, transportation (including space), energy, and STEM industries. The funding for much of the White Renaissance will come from the lawsuits discussed above.

The next subject I wish to address is religion and spirituality.  I tend to treat this subject with high importance and, as is said about politics, believe that while you might not care about spirituality that spirituality cares about you.  Humans are inclined towards belief, faith and the symbolic.  We need it for our well-being.  The globalist elites are extremely spiritual people and if you watch a Super Bowl halftime show or major award show you realize that they have your spirituality in mind as well. These acts are filled with masonic symbolism, racial amalgamation, and satanic imagery.  So while you might not care about what your minds and souls are exposed to, you can be sure that the globalist elites are taking care of this for you. Since these are the same people who push White genocide and global government, I think it shouldn’t be difficult to deduce that these “acts” (actually rituals) are not created for you or your children’s benefit.  Any attempt at planning for the future of the folk must include a discussion of religion and spirituality.

In the past I was designing a religion specifically for White people called the “White Path”(2).  While designing this religion I was reading a lot about the spread of Christianity through Europe in the early middle Ages and obtained a new appreciation for Christianity (3).  It dawned on me that a religion based on love, compassion, forgiveness, and charity, with a God that died for us, was superior to what I had thought up.  I also started leaning towards Christianity for its utility as a hedge against any possible aggressive reaction to the coming awakening of the White masses to White genocide.  Once the anti-White information campaign being disseminated by the media and education system for the last 50 years is uncovered as being part of the program of White genocide, the subsequent responses to the realities of a multiracial environment might be a bit disconcerting.  A situation like the one currently in Ferguson Missouri could end up much differently once the anti-White information frame (which produces the “acceptable”  perceptions, assumptions, myths, and narratives regarding racial issues) is removed (picture lampposts decorated with baggy clothed corpses).  My hope was that the Christian message could help mitigate the rage that 50 years of explicit anti-Whiteness could generate in the greater White working and middle class populations.  I also thought it wouldn’t be prudent to start suggesting changing the religion of the majority of White people for the last 1500-2000 years with all the other major changes that are coming out soon.

Of course there are strikes against Christianity that should be discussed. People out of the White Nationalist world sometimes argue that Christianity’s Jewish origin is reason for its disqualification. They say that a religion for Europeans should derive from the mind and soul of Europeans.  This is a legitimate argument. Of course, no one really knows for sure who wrote the New Testament and it can’t be denied that the God of the New Testament and the God of the Old Testament are nothing alike. At the same time Christianity could also be considered the most anti-Jewish religion in the world. The Gospel of John is quite anti-Jewish and while it was a Roman leader who legally sanctioned the Savior’s execution, it was the Jews who supplied the hateful motivations that lead to his death. Pilate gave the Jews  the opportunity to free a criminal or free Jesus, and we know who they chose. Some of the sources that describe Jesus describe him as being more European looking than Middle Eastern. Of course, these sources aren’t generally accepted among “mainstream historians.”  A Jewish origin Jesus really doesn’t bother this author as I explain it as God’s test of our humility. If God wants to make the Savior of the world come from the Jews, then this is his business.  This is similar to God telling Abraham to kill his son to prove his loyalty to God. Sometimes God’s ways look terribly wrong, but in the end his ways work out for the best. Another possibility is that Jesus came from the Jews because the Jews needed his message more than the rest of us?  The Jews had first dibs at Jesus but it was White Europeans who overwhelmingly accepted him as Lord and Savior and who with great zeal charged forward to spread his message to the nations.

Anyway, it’s not the Jewish origin that most concerns this author but the otherworldly focus of the religion. Can a faith that is mainly focused on the afterlife be reconciled with a human groups’ desire to survive in this world?  For many Christians, if the human group is Jewish then the answer is a resounding “yes.”  But try telling a Christian Pastor or Catholic Priest that the people of Europe wish to survive as a group and this would generate looks of outright horror. The same European peoples who created the Vatican, Gothic Cathedrals, and Gregorian chant would be publicly denied racial survival by most Catholic Priests, while the people who created the Protestant Reformation would hear the same renunciations by most Protestant ministers.   In some liberal Protestant denominations this would even be considered a sin.  Because of the “otherworldly” focus of Christianity, it would seem logical that they should remain out of the conversation altogether.  They could take the line that all people are examples of God’s greatness and if certain human groups wish to secure their survival that there should be no problem with this as long as they don’t infringe on the rights of others to do the same (a form of The Golden Rule).  Or they can take the position that their focus is on the soul and its salvation and that racial matters are of little concern to them. These are mainly political stances, so it should be noted that these generally change when the winds of power start to change.

But the question of the essence of Christianity and White survival is still unanswered.  Is a new religion needed for White people to truly reach divinity and find peace as we travel the universe in the future?  Would Christianity (due to its otherworldly nature) be an obstacle in raising the folk to the next level of being?  I will try to answer this as well as give a review of the “White Path” religion that I described in the past.

The White Path religion starts with the supreme God or Force or First Mover or All that is found in all other monotheistic religions (4).  This God is the creator of all things and the reason there is something instead of nothing. This God is beyond anything we can think of.  This God in the White Path religion is symbolized by a Golden Spiral Swastika (like the above spiral symbol but in gold color like below).  Those on the White Path worship this God and give him/she/it praise for all the good that God has provided especially the good of Whiteness. White humans on the White Path glorify God by creating powerful forms; the most powerful form being an intergalactic civilization (sometimes called the “Great White Art Project”), which includes the people who build it. No people have an exclusive claim to God but different people have different “paths” to God. For White people this is the White Path.

The next level down from God, on the White Path, is the “White gods” (5). These White gods (notice the small letter g), or advanced beings are the gods of European mythology.  These gods are our helpers as we create our intergalactic civilization for the glory of God. Whether they exist as supernatural beings as our ancestors thought,  corporeal extraterrestrials, or just as archetypes in our racial memories is still uncertain. But they do exist and they will also act as idealized “new men/woman” that we attempt to build ourselves into. The uppermost characteristic of building the intergalactic civilization is improving the people who build it. These future “Ubermenschen” are to be crafted without permanent cognitive connections with computers. In other words, these are not “transhumans” with their brains jacked into cloud networks. These are autonomous beings that will retain their humanity given to us by God.

The White Path is about glorifying God by building an intergalactic civilization with the help of the White gods.  As this civilization is built by and for White humans, all other humans will be lifted up as a result.  The White Path is “our” path (meaning White European derived peoples) but God belongs to all people. We will not interfere with the paths or ways of others as long as they don’t interfere with ours.  The concept of the afterlife is less emphasized on the White Path because nothing is really known about it for certain. Logic dictates however if there is a God that created us that this current life is most likely a test.  The characteristics most likely favored by the source of all goodness (aka God) would be selflessness, creativity, love, patience, honesty, compassion, logic, reason, and faith.  Since the building of the Great White Art Project will require these characteristics, the White Path would be optimal for cultivating and displaying such characteristics to the source of all goodness (aka God).  Within Christianity the focus is on compassion, love, charity, and forgiveness, with little regard for “worldliness.”  I’ve heard it said by Christian theologians that God will only ask you “how you loved” when you stand before him in judgement.   In many ways Christian doctrine advocates trading safety, comfort, and progress in this world for salvation in the next (which may not exist). Also keep in mind that The globalist elites find their spiritual nourishment in Freemasonry, Talmudism, the Kabbalah and other pagan ideas and symbolism. They follow faiths that encourage building global government, with them at the top with us “profane” “goyim” masses chiseled into bricks to fit into their pyramidical order. Meanwhile we follow a faith in Christianity that advocates denying “the world.”  We “turn the other cheek” while they take “an eye for an eye” or sometimes just take an eye  ( if that’s what their NWO requires).   The White Path advocates living and planning for both. The White Path advocates living life for Above and for Below.

Here’s a quick case study comparison. Currently in the Southern part of the US there have been a large number of foreign migrants illegally flooding the country (including many unsupervised children). This created a “humanitarian crises.”  The Christian approach for dealing with this issue is to bring these people into our communities and to adopt the children into our homes.  Whether or not this has a long term effect on the civilizational quality of the West (and henceforth the whole world) is not of any concern because these actions will get us to heaven for eternity. The White Path’s approach for dealing with this issue is to build a system for making these people more capable of making their own homelands more like the countries they want to flood in to. Parts of America would be portioned for foreigners to work and learn and save money before going home. This approach protects the civilizational quality of White lands but also helps out the people in need.  Since little is known about the afterlife, the White Path doesn’t advocate gambling everything for a time we know almost nothing about. But at the same time it allows one to die with a conscious knowing that you made life better for the less fortunate, regardless of race, which many traditional European pagan religions or materialist philosophies (like National Socialism) fail to consider (or outright reject).  However, if it ends up that nothing happens after death, then we can die knowing that we contributed to raising up the folk to a higher level (and by extension all people) and that our legacy lives on through the Great White Art Project and through our progeny.

Here’s some questions to consider.  What has contributed to the alleviation of more suffering in the world; Christianity, or White man’s technology?  Here’s another  to consider for people who strongly believe in an afterlife. Just as there are people who claim to follow Jesus “just in case” there is an afterlife, should not steps be taken “just in case” there isn’t? Why wouldn’t we, with great eagerness, attempt to save the human group of Plato, Socrates, Aristotle,  Pythagoras, Bach, Da Vinci, Newton, Shakespeare, Franklin, Washington, Tesla, etc.?  And for the non-believing materialists out there thinking about this, is not the beauty of White women alone enough to enthusiastically support White survival? From whatever angle one thinks about this issue, once people of European origin are gone there is no bringing them back. So let’s not take the chance!

Practitioners of the White Path should glorify, meditate on, and pray to God every day and pray to the White gods at least once a week.  At least once a month you are to conduct the “White Rite.”  This should include a golden swastika spiral symbol, a representation of the White gods (drawings, statues, Tiwaz rune), at least one White candle, a beer stein, and a beer product (ale, IPA, Stout, lager, etc.).  You should arrange the objects involved so the God spiral is highest with the White god image under it and the White candle in between. The images should be facing south so that you face the North when looking at them. You should light the candle, ask the White gods to be present and hold up the stein and ask God to turn the beer into holy nectar that will empower you to do your best part in building the Great White Intergalactic Civilization which will glorify God and secure a future for White people. You should then drink one sip or gulp of the beer. Only fill the stein with enough beer to drink it in one gulp (whatever this may be for you). If outdoors, you may dump some on the ground for your ancestors after taking a gulp. Put the stein down and conclude the White Rite by doing a Roman Salute northward while saying “Hail God.”  In the future, if the White Path becomes the organized religion for White people the White Rite will become more elaborate and the use of temples and giant White Cathedrals will be utilized (6).

I have no idea what the future of White Western religion and spiritually will be like. I believe a lot will depend on the actions of the Christian churches.  If the churches give support or at least display tolerance towards the question of White survival then they very well might remain the faith of Western man/woman for another 2000 years (they’ll probably see a major increase in attendance as well).  But if they act as another anti-White cog in the anti-White machine don’t be surprised if the White gods return to reclaim their people. The holy archetypes of Jesus, Mary, and the Saints may get replaced by the new/old holy archetypes of Odin, Frigg, Thor, and Freya?  In the end it’s all up to God and it is God who will decide.  One thing is for certain, White people need to be sure they have an active spiritual and religious life now and in the future. The globalist elites (7) and their god of Lucifer (8) might be headed for a major defeat in the near future, but they will be back. Whites must remember that the task of racial survival is like a garden in that it’s never really done. The weeds will always come back, so it’s best to plant flowers, plants,and grass, so that the weeds aren’t able to root into the soil. If you find the White Path religion interesting, I suggest reading all my posts on the “White Path” religion which can be found in the “categories” column to your right. I also recommend reading the posts on “the gods.”

As for the author (and creator of the Systems and Symbols blog) this post is going to be my last for a long time; perhaps even forever. I need to concentrate inward and intensely tend to my own garden. I need to ponder the Almighty and attempt to glimpse at and interpret his Will for my life.  I need to rotate away for some time before rotating back to this orbital point.  Within this blog holds the solutions for many of the world’s most complicated issues.  now I must spend time Addressing an even More complicated iSSue:

.

“Win power over yourself and you will have power over everything in the spiritual and physical worlds that strive against you.”

-Guido Von List

“First keep thyself in peace, and then shalt thou be able to be a peacemaker towards others.”

-Thomas Kempis

(1) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/07/13/the-systemic-and-symbolic-realms/

(2) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/the-white-path/

(3) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2014/04/19/jesus-is-good/

(4) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/godthe-allthe-forcethe-uber-rotator/

(5) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/09/08/the-gods-on-the-white-path/

(6) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2014/01/05/cathedrals-rituals-heroes-and-relics-on-the-white-path/

(7) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/characteristics-of-the-globalist-elites/

(8) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/satanluciferthe-devil/

“Glory to God in the highest; and on earth peace to people of good will.”

Venice, England, The Tudors, and Lucifer

The White Rabbit (see my blogroll) recently started discussing the history of the Venetians. In discussing this history he has been relying on the work of Joseph P. Farrell (1) and Webster Tarpley (2). Tarpley has been writing on Venice for a long time and in his work he has addressed the infiltration of the Venetians into England. From Tarpley’s work it appears that the Venetians gained a foothold into England during the reign of Henry the 8^th.  Here are a few paragraphs from an essay by Tarpley that serves as a good introduction:

Henry VIII was King of England between 1509 and 1547. His accession to the throne coincided with the outbreak of the War of the League of Cambrai, in which most European states, including France, the Holy Roman Empire (Germany), Spain, and the papacy of Pope Julius II della Rovere joined together in a combination that bid fair to annihilate Venice and its oligarchy. The League of Cambrai was the world war that ushered in the modern era. Henry VIII attracted the attention of the Venetian oligarchy when he – alone among the major rulers of Europe – maintained a pro-Venetian position during the crisis years of 1509-1510, just as Venice was on the brink of destruction. Henry VIII was for a time the formal ally of Venice and Pope Julius. The Venetian oligarchy became intrigued with England.

In 1527, when Henry VIII sought to divorce Catherine of Aragon, the Venetian-controlled University of Padua endorsed Henry’s legal arguments. Gasparo Contarini, the dominant political figure of the Venetian oligarchy, sent to the English court a delegation which included his own uncle, Francesco Zorzi. The oligarch and intelligence operative Zorzi, consummately skilled in playing on Henry’s lust and paranoia, became the founder of the powerful Rosicrucian, Hermetic, cabalistic, and Freemasonic tradition in the Tudor court. Later, Henry VIII took the momentous step of breaking with the Roman Papacy to become the new Constantine and founder of the Anglican Church. He did this under the explicit advice of Thomas Cromwell, a Venetian agent who had become his chief adviser. Thomas Cromwell was Henry VIII’s business agent in the confiscation of the former Catholic monasteries and other church property, which were sold off to rising families. Thomas Cromwell thus served as the midwife to many a line of oligarchs.

Under the impact of the War of the League of Cambrai, the Venetian oligarchy realized the futility of attempting a policy of world domination from the tiny base of a city-state among the lagoons of the northern Adriatic. As was first suggested by the present writer in 1981, the Venetian oligarchy (especially its “giovani” faction around Paolo Sarpi) responded by transferring its family fortunes (fondi), philosophical outlook, and political methods into such states as England, France, and the Netherlands. Soon the Venetians decided that England (and Scotland) was the most suitable site for the New Venice, the future center of a new, world-wide Roman Empire based on maritime supremacy. Success of this policy required oligarchical domination and the degradation of the political system by wiping out any Platonic humanist opposition. (3)

As the above essay shows, England would be a perfect place to export the Venetian model to. It was an Island, which make invasion very difficult, it was seafaring,  and it had a growing population of Northern Europeans.  After reading the works of Tarpley and Farrell, I started thinking about certain things that stuck out to me relating to the Showtime series “The Tudors.”  The Tudors was about the reign of Henry the 8^th. As the essay of Tarpley points out, it was during the reign of Henry the 8^th when the Venetians got a foothold into England.  After re-watching the Tudors, after reading the work of Tarpley and Farrell, I realized that something (or someone) else may have been exported to England besides just the Venetian “model?”

In the Tudors you can plainly see the influence of Venice, as Henry the 8^th wanted to build the Venetian ship that the Doge of Venice rode in to carry out the annual “marriage of the Sea” ritual. In this ritual the Doge of Venice renewed Venice’s “vows” with the sea (4). During the ceremony the Doge drops a concentrated ring into the sea. The sea was critical to Venice since Venice was a maritime power and depended on oversea trade for its wealth.  Henry the 8^th intended to have his Wife Jane Seymour ride in the ship to her coronation. Sadly, Queen Jane died in child birth and never got to take this ride. But it was after her death on the Tudors, that I noticed something veeery interesting.

During Season 3 episode 5 of the Tudors we see Henry the 8^th mourning the death of his wife Jane Seymour.  It was during this episode that we see a new character on the show. This was the character of Will Somers; the king’s fool (5). Through a whole 2 and a half seasons we never see Somers until this episode, and he does not appear again after it. Somers is the only person that King Henry would be around during times of depression and despair. We first see Somers talking to the King and calling King Henry an “idiot” for allowing his last wife to die.  Somers appears to be free to say anything to King Henry that would get any other person dead.  It was interesting that Somers is depicted on the Tudors as having had quite a philosophical mind.  In conversations with Henry he seems to understand the consciousness-centric nature of the universe, as he tells Henry that “all of this is a dream” and that “the only thing that is real is in men’s heads.”

 Later while talking about the great palace that Henry is planning, Somers pokes fun at the idea of such a Palace and Henry calls him a “fool.” While they play cards Henry tells Somers not to “play the fool.”  Somers says “why not?”  Henry continues to talk about the palace that he plans on building. Somers points out that like the Roman ruins or the Colossus of Rhoades that “all things tend towards their ruin, even the great houses and the fools who built them.”

It was with this last line (about the great houses and the fools who build them) that I realized who Somers really was.  Will Somers was Lucifer. This character was Will Somers but with Lucifer transposed on him. This happens sometimes with film or literature. A writer will use the role of one character and transpose 2 or more people on the same character.  When Somers/Lucifer talked about the “fools” that build great houses, he wasn’t referring to Henry; he was referring to himself. So along with the Venetian “model” that came to England, the “boss” may have come too? It’s no mistake that the Tudor emblem was a stylized pentagram.  The war of the roses may have been a fight to see what House would run the new Empire for Lucifer? Lucifer has been building Houses from Babylon, to Rome, to Venice and then on to England as he tries to build is world order. Many people in the alternative research community speculate London as the global administrative center for the so called “New World Order.” If Lucifer is on earth, then it’s very likely that he would act as a father figure or mentor to the most powerful people on earth.

Later in the episode we see Henry and Somers getting drunk and discussing the new articles of faith of the Church of England. They’re discussing the Bible and Somers’ shows great knowledge of the Bible for a person who most likely had little education.  Henry starts saying the end of the revised Lord’s Prayer “for thine is the kingdom,” and then Somers takes over and says “the power and glory.”  I never knew until much later in my life that this part of the Lord’s Prayer was added to the Bible by Henry the 8^th. Was this a reference to his great King Lucifer, the “fool” who created his great House?  Perhaps in public Lucifer “played the fool” as Will Sumers but then behind closed doors was the boss?  I think it’s more likely that Lucifer would have stayed out-of-sight of the public and only had contacts with the power figures. So the historical Somers was most likely not Lucifer but on the Tudors Lucifer was transposed onto Somers.

The real Will Somers was actually quite younger then Henry the 8^th but in the Tudors show he is depicted as much older than Henry the 8^th.  As written above, on the Tudors he was also quite well read and wise to the world. When Henry starts to cry over the death of his wife Somers holds Henry and tells him that “this too shall pass.”  He then gives some motivational words to Henry to get his soldier back out into the field. We then see Lord Cromwell being awakened by Somers by saying “wakey wakey” and Cromwell looked horrified. Later we see Henry talking to his Churchmen and Lords about the articles of faith for the church of England. Henry adds the new part of Lord’s Prayer. After this we see Lord Cromwell and Lord Rich alone talking about the new church articles. As hardcore reformers they lament the fact that Henry isn’t doing enough to smash the Catholic aspects of the church. Cromwell says that the King “has always been a true catholic at heart, except in this one thing, that he would have neither the Pope nor Luther nor any other man set above him.”  We then move to the last scene which shows Somers/Lucifer sitting on the King’s throne at night wearing a crown laughing in a demonic manner (see photo at top).  Was the “him” Cromwell was referring to Henry the 8^th, or was it Somers/Lucifer?

Movie producers and writers are the great magicians and alchemists of our time (6). They have the ability and means to affect the consciousness’s of people in great numbers.  In my review of HBO’s Deadwood (7), I have shown that TV shows and movies are used for the dissemination of esoteric information. People like David Milch (creator of Deadwood) and Michael Hirst (creator of the Tudors) are extremely knowledgeable and like many movie producers tend to have some sort of inside knowledge on the workings of the world.  They write shows in multilayers. Shows like the Tudors or Deadwood contain secret information that can only be seen by people who have the “eyes” to see it. I watched the Tudors two years ago but after obtaining new information it made the Tudors mean something different. I observed the Tudors, rotated away from it, and upon rotating back was able to take away more from it based on the information I observed during my time away from it. On the DVD sleeve of The Tudors set there’s a horned figure on the stained glass window over Henry’s right shoulder (see directly below). This person was most likely Moses, but regardless it is interesting that it was used in this image.

The dissolution of monasteries and the massacres that occurred afterwards on loyal Catholics makes more sense in light of the Venetian connection. If England was going to be a world empire it couldn’t have the Catholic Church operating with such power in its realm. The monasteries were the backbone of the church. For this reason they had to be smashed. For the average person living in England the Abbey’s and monasteries were everything. Life was organized around activities at these sites. The Abbeys provided alms to the poor, educational institutions, and hospitals. They fixed bridges, sea walls, and tilled crops. People celebrated feasts for Saints and the monasteries were directly involved. When someone couldn’t afford their children they could give them to the monasteries that would bring them up. The beauty and wealth of these institutions was immense. All of it was destroyed and the wealth transferred to the king and his loyal lords. The mass killings of Catholics after the “Pilgrimage of Grace” may have been a requirement by Lucifer for Henry.  Lucifer may require a certain amount of blood to be spilled to keep in his good graces.  It shows him that his agents will do his will and the mass death itself may bring Lucifer some sort of personal satisfaction.

The Venetian model also requires obedience to the state. By destroying the Abbeys people would have to rely on the state for social welfare. Henry the 8^th also outlawed the majority of feast days of the year. The Tudors show depicted Cromwell complaining about the feast days as a waste of revenue. He said that the people should be working in the fields. This is a perfect example of how the Oligarchical mind thinks. They would prefer people working over praying or spending time with their families. It’s no mistake that the Protestant ethic says that hard work, frugality and diligence are evidence of grace.  It’s also no mistake that some people think Martin Luther was a Venetian agent (8).The rise of the Protestant Reformation saw years of war between Catholics and Protestants in which the Venetian banksers funded both sides.

I really must suggest watching the Tudors, or at least episode 5 of season 3 to see this Will Somers character. If you’re new to my blog, I also suggest reading about the character of Lucifer which can be found at this link: https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/satanluciferthe-devil/.

It’s important that the reader understand that when I discuss Lucifer, that I believe him to be an actual corporeal extraterrestrial being who heads the powers of earth, and not the traditional evil spirit Lucifer of Christian or Jewish theology. There is clearly something not human at the head of the Anglo-American-Judeo-Illuminati-Globalist-Elite (9). It could be that the creator of the Tudors was showing us who this is?

(1) http://www.amazon.com/Joseph-P.-Farrell/e/B001KCNKF4

(2) http://tarpley.net/

(3) http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/how-the-venetian-system-was-transplanted-into-england/

(4) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucentaur

(5) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Sommers

(6) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/11/21/black-magic-narrative/

(7) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/following-the-white-rabbit-through-deadwood/

(8) http://www.abjpress.com/tarpv2.html

(9) http://beforeitsnews.com/power-elite/2013/03/globalists-concentrated-in-4-cities-ny-dc-london-hollywood-2441680.html

Verrrry Interesting

Today I made a comment at Counter Currents Publishing in reply to a post titled “White Extinction”(1).  The basic argument of the post was that Whites are facing extinction and are in need of a homeland.  Here was my comment:

I believe we need White spaces and institutions to guarantee survival.  When it comes to White spaces, the options are either White areas within multi-racial countries or outright White countries.  I agree that an outright White country would be more efficient in maintaining survival, my concerns are with the cost of achieving these all White countries.

What is the cost of partitioning lets say 2/3 of America for Whites only?  How many people are you willing to see die (Whites and non-Whites) to achieve it?

White Nationalists overwhelmingly believe that the Jews rule the Western world. I once thought this way as well, but now realize the situation is (unfortunately) more complicated. It’s more likely that the Western world is ruled by several factions, one of which is world Jewry, but the others being masonic “WASP” Anglo-American elites (with the head being British aristocracy) , and the other being Continental European (with the head being German). In general the Jews and masonic WASPs tend to be aligned. The Continental European side tends to have stronger connections with the Catholic Church and in the last 20 years with Russia.

The last time this group did battle was WWII and since 1945 we’ve had a period of peace. But since the early 2000’s this period of peace has started to unwind.

So what happens when the Anglo-American masonic WASP side starts to see itself loosing its position and decides that its only hope to retain power is to offer North American Whites a “deal.”  Lets say they give Whites full power over the military and the right to force non-Whites off 67% of the land mass of the US.  Mormonism would be the State religion and you’d have to pledge you fealty to the British Royal family. After this new White State is established, the population would have to go to war against the Continental Europeans to “smash the Huns and mongol Russians.”    Over time you’d have to take a chip in your hand, but this would just be to “keep the children safe.”

How many of you would take this deal to get a White State in North America?  What aspects would you reject (Mormonism?, the chip?, war with Europe and Russia?) .

One more question:  Lets say Americans were given total freedom of association (meaning the right to communities, institutions, businesses with who they wanted) and there was end to State financed anti-Whiteness (including a moratorium on non-White immigration) . How many here would still fight for an all White State?

My take on it is this, as much as I’d like an all White State in North America, the cost of getting it would probably be too great. So instead, I’d see total freedom of association and the institutions (media, educational, spiritual) to make White people better off. Then over time as White communities join other White communities, slowly Whites may wish to form something new.  This will be a slower process.  A more organic process to White Statehood.  This way would eliminate the death and suffering involved in cutting out a new White state in North America. It would also greatly reduce the chances for power elites to use us for their bigger plans.

When I checked back at Counter Currents to see if it generated any discussion, I found that at least half of it was erased. Here’s what made it though CC moderation:

I believe we need White spaces and institutions to guarantee survival. When it comes to White spaces, the options are either White areas within multi-racial countries or outright White countries. I agree that an outright White country would be more efficient in maintaining survival, my concerns are with the cost of achieving these all White countries.

What is the cost of partitioning lets say 2/3 of America for Whites only? How many people are you willing to see die (Whites and non-Whites) to achieve it?

One more question: Lets say Americans were given total freedom of association (meaning the right to communities, institutions, businesses with who they wanted) and there was end to State financed anti-Whiteness (including a moratorium on non-White immigration) . How many here would still fight for an all White State?

My take on it is this, as much as I’d like an all White State in North America, the cost of getting it would probably be too great. So instead, I’d see total freedom of association and the institutions (media, educational, spiritual) to make White people better off. Then over time as White communities join other White communities, slowly Whites may wish to form something new. This will be a slower process. A more organic process to White Statehood. This way would eliminate the death and suffering involved in cutting out a new White state in North America. It would also greatly reduce the chances for power elites to use us for their bigger plans.

Here’s the parts that were removed:

White Nationalists overwhelmingly believe that the Jews rule the Western world. I once thought this way as well, but now realize the situation is (unfortunately) more complicated. It’s more likely that the Western world is ruled by several factions, one of which is world Jewry, but the others being masonic “WASP” Anglo-American elites (with the head being British aristocracy) , and the other being Continental European (with the head being German). In general the Jews and masonic WASPs tend to be aligned. The Continental European side tends to have stronger connections with the Catholic Church and in the last 20 years with Russia.   

The last time this group did battle was WWII and since 1945 we’ve had a period of peace. But since the early 2000’s this period of peace has started to unwind. 

So what happens when the Anglo-American masonic WASP side starts to see itself loosing its position and decides that its only hope to retain power is to offer North American Whites a “deal.”  Lets say they give Whites full power over the military and the right to force non-Whites off 67% of the land mass of the US.  Mormonism would be the State religion and you’d have to pledge you fealty to the British Royal family. After this new White State is established, the population would have to go to war against the Continental Europeans to “smash the Huns and mongol Russians.”    Over time you’d have to take a chip in your hand, but this would just be to “keep the children safe.” 

How many of you would take this deal to get a White State in North America?  What aspects would you reject (Mormonism?, the chip?, war with Europe and Russia?) . 

As you the reader can see, there’s nothing in my comments that are vulgar, or violent, or combative. I was perplexed over why this part would be edited?  But then I remembered another comment I posted at CC that was erased outright (never made it through moderation)(2). Here’s what I wrote in that post:

“Race is obviously critical in the WN/Pro-White worldview and organizing principle. We need to talk more about what the concept of “Whiteness” really means. But I still wonder what it is that lies beyond that?  Here are some situations to consider.

Let’s say tomorrow the Anglo-American elites, which belong to an organization like this one (1), come and call a big meeting with the White Nationalist community and offer this. They offer to give White Nationalists a high level authority over 67% of the geographic space of America. They offer to give Whites the power over media, politics, popular culture, with even more power than people suppose Jews to have today. They offer to change the living locations for all non-Whites (from this 67% of the country) except in a few major cities throughout “middle America” where international commerce is conducted.  We’ll say 67 present of the country is under “White Law.”

BUT

Everybody has to take a chip in their bodies to be tracked by organizations owned and ran by the Anglo-American elites (2). I’ll call this #1  “White Nationalist + chip situation.”

Here’s another scenario. An America that has FREEdom OF ASSoCIAtiON along with an end to publicly paid anti-Whiteness.  A more localized political life while setting up economic flows between other traditionalist parties across the world.  Teutons, Russian traditionalists, British nationalists but also Hindus, Japanese, South America indigenous Indians, North American Indians, Chinese Nationalists, Israelis and other Jews who will respect our boundaries. I call this #2 “Traditionalist-Freedom of association” situation.

What situation would you prefer #1 or #2?

I’d take #2.

I wouldn’t be able to accept (for example) the force relocation of the America Indians. Or the forced return of “African Americans” (blacks who are descended from black slaves) to Africa.  I have something that I place above ultimate White racial interests. I couldn’t maliciously fuck over innocent people for my political worldview or metaphysical outlook. Something in my being does not allow me to put racial interests at the very top.

BUT HERE’S A THIRD SCENARIO!!! #3!!!.  Let’s say some Ubermensch-like, White extraterrestrials land one day and say:

“OK you pasted the test. We made you and put you in this situation with non-Whites to see if you’d let yourselves get wiped out. Since you made it this long; you past the test. Now you Whites must kill off every single non-White and every single Jew in the world. Then we’ll build an intergalactic civilization with us teaching you the mysteries of the Universe while you live as colonists for us laying down our law across the universe.”   I call this #3 the “Ubermensch test for US” situation.

Who would take # 3?

To the readers, at least just post the number you’d prefer, if you don’t feel like discussing it. Or feel free to discuss your choice.

So after reading over this comment, I started comparing the two. I looked for aspects that were in the first comment removed that matched the parts that were edited from the latest. From comparing the two it seems that my offenses were in mentioning the Anglo-American-masonic “WASP” elites (3) and from my speculations of possible scenarios in which the Anglo-American-Masonic “WASP” elites could create an all-White homeland in North America if they were faced with the threat of loss of power or loss of existence. I believe the following two words sum up this situation perfectly (watch video below):

(1) http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/02/white-extinction/#more-45475

(2) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/11/28/happy-thanksgiving-pilgrims/

(3) https://wikispooks.com/ISGP/organisations/Pilgrims_Society02.htm

*Note: Despite this “verrry interesting” observance, I believe Counter Currents is the best White Nationalist website (outside of the BUGS-White Rabbit sphere) in the world today. I recommend donating to their website.

https://secure.counter-currents.com/donate/

 

The “Dark Enlightenment”

Lately I’ve been examining the so called “Dark Enlightenment” (DE) movement. Since some pro-White/WN entitles are getting grouped with the DE, I thought I’d better investigate this phenomenon (especially considering the recent media coverage [1]).  Here are my thoughts at this point. I have 3 major points.

1) First of all the term “Dark Enlightenment” is a contradiction. By definition enlightenment can’t be dark. By using the term “DE” you play into the enemy’s playbook. We are not the side that demands another group of people get force-assimilated out of existence. We’re not the ones looking to demonize the culture of others in order to weaken and destroy them. We’re not the ones advocating global government. We’re not the ones pumping a degenerate toxic culture into the minds of Western youth. We’re not demanding that certain political speech be made illegal. We’re not the ones advocating jail time for disagreeing with certain versions of historical events. We are the true champions of choice and freedom. We’re the advocates of true diversity. We also value community, beauty, and order.

Our enemies are the side of ugliness, forced diversity which leads to homogeneity, and disorder. They’re the ones who have to lie and force people to live according to their world view. They have to spend trillions of dollars pushing the anti-White narrative in the media and education systems. They have to over report White-on-non-white crime and under report non-white-on-White crime. They have to push the sex wage gap myth.

All we have to do is tell the truth. All we have to do is point out that “anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.” All we have to do is attack their “pretty lies.”

2) The word “Cathedral” as a label for the enemy is wrong. The Gothic cathedral is probably the greatest artistic-symbolic achievement of Western civilization. To call the enemies of the West “the Cathedral” is offensive. A better term would be “the regime.” An even better name is the Forces of Satanic Darkness. ”

These first 2 points I can live with if they prove effective. But my 3^rd point relates more to ideology than terminology.

3) The DE movement is basically a right wing movement. Its major premises are as follows:

1. People are not equal. They never will be. We reject equality in all its forms.
2. Right is right and left is wrong.
3. Hierarchy is basically a good idea.
4. Traditional sex roles are basically a good idea.
5. Libertarianism is retarded.
6. Democracy is irredeemably flawed and we need to do away with it.(2)

I can agree with this list for the most part. While people are unequal they should be equal under the law. Traditional sex roles are preferable but if the greatest theoretical physicist in the nation is a woman, then she should be encouraged to do physics.  Libertardianism is indeed retarded (enough said).  Outright democracy is flawed, but at the local level democratic procedures are preferable.

My problem comes from the premise that “right is right and left is wrong.”  There are certain policies and philosophies that come out of the left that are clearly superior to the right (workers’ rights, environmental protection, minimum wages, social welfare services for people and families in need, animal rights, etc.). If you mix this premise of “right is right” with the premise “hierarchy is basically a good idea” then you get a society that looks like Norman England where people get their hands chopped off for removing a dead branch from the lord’s forest. I envision a drone leaving a neo-Norman keep to drop munitions on someone who tampered with his embedded tracking microchip.

From reading DE blogs I do notice a strain of  blatant elitism and disdain for the masses. At this point I haven’t detected what forces could be behind the DE movement but will now state that we should remain vigilant to the possibility of the Anglo-American (read “American” as the Eastern Establishment) elites using this movement as a vehicle to retain power.  In other words, the Anglo-American elites may say

“OK, you don’t want multiculturalism, Judaics running loose, white genocide; you say you want your “traditional society,” that’s OK, we’ll give you that, we’ll also give you a hierarchical structure that is very “traditional” mwaaahahaa… remember, head man gets the first fruit….mwaahahaha.”

Then over time the Anglo-American elites will let some Judaics back into the country that will lead a revolution overthrowing some drunken monarch that is set up for the purpose of being overthrown, and then White genocide and the whole foul cycle will start over again.  That’s why I suggest taking that which is “right from the right and that which is right from the left.”

You end forced diversity,neutralize out-of-control Judiacs, end White genocide, end cultural degeneracy, promote traditional values and culture; BUT also include the best aspects of the left (i.e. workers’ rights, environmental protection, minimum wages, certain social welfare services for people and families in real need, animal rights, etc).  You promote local capabilities and let local people determine the needs of local folks. You build a society that promotes economic stability (through the policies from the left) and cultural/spiritual stability (through the policies of the right). You build a society that is very difficult to subvert because it makes almost all parties content.

But where does this disdain for the masses come from?  And haven’t we seen this before?  Does not the current batch of Western “leaders” refer to the masses as “goyim” and/or “profane?” I will admit that when I first became aware of the forces that make this world operate that I too could become disappointed at the masses inability to see this as well. But I now realize that this sight is a gift. This author does not have the gifts necessary to frame a house, read Sanskrit, tap dance, write software, or do heart surgery. The Almighty has seen fit to make my gifts that of sight and of joining-matters-aright (3) (4). A harmonious, well order society is one where everybody plays a role utilizing their gifts allotted to them by the Creator. A society run by a bunch of haughty aristocrats or boyars is not only morally wrong and unjust, but it provides an opening for the most parasitical factions to enter (as seen in the French and Bolshevik revolutions). The DE has some promising ideas and intelligent people pushing these ideas, but woe to any movement that would act as vehicle for the current globalist elites (5) to retain power.

[1] http://www.vocativ.com/12-2013/dark-enlightenment-creepy-internet-movement-youd-better-take-seriously/

(2) http://www.xenosystems.net/premises-of-neoreaction/

(3) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/09/28/so-you-want-to-save-america/

(4) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/tag/king-of-the-united-states-of-america/

(5) http://beforeitsnews.com/power-elite/2013/03/globalists-concentrated-in-4-cities-ny-dc-london-hollywood-2441680.html

King of the United States of America

Recently an article was published at the Politico website in which the author (MICHAEL AUSLIN of the America Enterprise Institute) made an argument for a King/Queen or “First Citizen” of the United States (1).  The role of the King/Queen he described was mostly symbolic and ceremonial.

The purpose of this article is to discuss the idea of a King/Queen (or First Citizen) of the United States.

If there was to be an American King/Queen or “First Citizen” their main purpose would be to serve the citizens of the United States by defending them against the elites. They would be the #1 advocate for the people’s interests. They would openly stand against the most parasitical and exploitive elements of the political and left and right as well as vehemently opposing the forces pushing the US (and the world) into global government.

From the right the King/Queen would defend the people against the corporatist and militarist elements (aka the “military-industrial-complex”). He/she would advocate for better wages and better benefits for working people. The First Citizen would advocate for a national healthcare system. He/she would oppose the creation of genetically modified foods. The King/Queen would defend the environment from corporate polluters. The King/Queen would be a promoter of small and mid-size businesses. He/she would oversee an education system that is capable of creating enough people in the STEM fields to make the United States non-dependent on foreign migrants to do this work. The King/Queen would keep its citizens from fighting unnecessary wars for corporate, Zionist, and/or globalist interests.

From the left the Queen/King would defend the people against the forces of cultural Marxism and political correctness. She/he would oppose anti-Whiteness and cultural degeneracy. She/he would defend freedom of speech. She/he would advocate states’ rights and freedom of association. She/he would defend the traditional family and the right to bear arms. This First Citizen would fight for the people’s right to not be spied on by intelligence agencies for no reason. The Queen/King would fight to greatly limit immigration and work to reform the immigration laws in a way that would benefit the working people of the US.  The Queen/King would expose and fight the major forces that attempt to push the United States into globalist entities like the so called “North American Union.”

The institutions that the King/Queen would work closely with to bring about and maintain these arrangements would be labor unions, small business councils, educational institutions, churches, and non-governmental organizations. These institutions are populated by the people and work to benefit the people. The First Citizen would work close to the people in order to remain in touch with them. Less time would be spent in elite circles and elite organizations. In fact, it’s best if the King/Queen spent no time socially with the elites.  When it comes to the American elites or aristocracy (celebrities, economic elites, eastern establishment, media figures, political families), it would be all business.

The First Citizen would have veto power over the President. They should serve for 20 years and (as AUSLIN suggests in his article) be “nominated by the serving First Citizen himself, approved unanimously by the speaker and minority leader of the House and the majority and minority leaders of the Senate and ratified by a unanimous Supreme Court.” They should live in a Gothic style castle  in Washington DC. They would also have a second castle near the mean population center of the United States and a third on the West coast. In the Senate/House chambers they would have a throne that would sit in a place that would suggest high importance relative to everyone else. Every six months the King/Queen would have a sort of “question time” with the President, House Leaders, Senate Leaders, Supreme Court Justices, and any department heads that he/she calls on. This would take place in the castle in DC and the King would sit on a throne while the national leadership stood in front of him/her.  The King/Queen would question these leaders based on the concerns of the citizenry.

The one feature that I’m still pondering is whether or not they should wear a crown? For now I’ll say “yes,” and this crown would be worn during special events like the “question time” and the “State of the Union” and other national ceremonial events.  The King/Queen would be crowned in the National Cathedral in Washington DC by the clergy of his/her choice.  The King/Queen would swear a solemn oath before Almighty God that he/she will defend the interests of the American people before all others. This oath should explicitly ask the Almighty to strike them down for reasons of corruption and/or treason against the American people.

The First Citizen should be married with kids.  The spouse of the First Citizen would be known as the King or Queen “consort.”  They should be a veteran. They should not be a Freemason.  They should be formally educated (at least a bachelor’s degree) but should not have attended an Ivy League school.  They should not have held political office.  They should be at least a “nominal Christian” in that they would recognize Christianity as the dominant American cultural religion and be sympathetic to the basic philosophies of Jesus Christ.  The King/Queen and their family should be a model for all other citizens to look up to.

In contrast with the King/Queen I envision, The First Citizen described by Mr. Auslin really has little purpose. In fact his kind of King/Queen would be a propaganda figure that the people would find distraction in that would keep the attention off the actions of the elites that Mr. Auslin serves. This is what the Monarchy of Great Britain does. The British Monarchy is very popular and people feel pride about them. But the truth is that this monarchy does nothing to quell the power of the elites and, in fact, is even in league with them. The kind of First Citizen (and First Family) you could expect from Mr. Auslin’s ilk would either come from within  the American elite (who tend to be related to the British monarchy) and/or be a model multiracial/multicultural American “new man/womyn” and “new family” (multi-racial couple with a pair of adopted kids from Haiti and Cambodia) to help in the social engineering campaign.

The King/Queen or First Citizen that I described would serve the people first and put the elites in check.  That is why (just like my suggestions in my article on How to Save America [2]) this will probably never happen?  But just like my article on how to save America, I felt it my duty to write this just so nobody can ever say that I didn’t try to provide a better solution.

(1) http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/01/america-needs-a-king-101691.html#.UttQ2RAo7IU

[2] https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/09/28/so-you-want-to-save-america/

Look for future articles on monarchy to come out soon at SS.

Which Way?

My previous post (1) regarding the White Path (2) religion is the last post on this topic that I plan on writing.  This doesn’t mean that I definitely won’t write about in the future; it just means I have no set plans to do so. I have no illusions that there’s much of a chance for such a religion to come into existence anyway. But for some reason the spirit moved in me to lay down this idea so I did so. Now it’s up to God-the Force-the Uber Rotator (3) to decide whether or not it will become something beyond a brainstorming session for this author.

I wholeheartedly believe that the people of the West are in desperate need of spirituality. However, after further reflection, it very well could be the case that advocating for a new religion for White people (at this point in history) may be counterproductive to the main mission of ending White genocide. The people of the West are overwhelmingly Christian, so it’s a very difficult task to get them to change after 2000 years of Christian influence.  This could also make the churches feel threatened, which may put them against the pro-White movement more than they already are.  Getting Whites to understand the program of White genocide is already challenging enough without trying to introduce a new religion to consider.

Besides practical political reasons, there are spiritual reasons as well. I’ve been studying Christianity more closely over the last 4-6 months (especially its spread through Europe during the Middle Ages) and I’ve come to find a new appreciation for it. The pre Christian gods of Europe were gods that reflected human behavior. They could be brave, greedy, cruel, noble, lustful, duplicitous, jealous, loving, hateful, and limited in their power. The religion of Jesus Christ however is a high idea. Jesus was/is a god of love, charity, forgiveness, and good works. The Christian god of Jesus Christ didn’t reflect human behavior; He was something higher for humans to emulate.

From the perspective of the wellbeing of the people, a religion based on the archetype of Christ is more beneficial for them and the society as a whole compared to the pagan faiths of the classical and Germanic worlds, or a religion with racial survival as its highest sacrament (such as the White Path). God is made up of the sum of the consciousness’s of all conscious observers plus something else that transcends the total set of conscious beings.  The question of whether God loves us can mostly be answered by asking if we love ourselves and the world we observe.  Since we are a part of God, we are a major factor in determining God’s love for us and God’s grace in relation to our lives.

Unfortunately this high idea of love, forgiveness, and charity has been used to help carry out genocide against the White people of earth (4). The idea here is that since Christ commands us to love one another, this means that White people (and only White people) are required to be blended out of existence through forced integration with non-Whites.  This concept has been circulated by all the major Christian denominations. The churches have played and do play a major role in channeling non-Whites into Western countries purely out of their desire to grow their congregations and to gain favor with the anti-White globalist elites. Instead of serving their communities, the churches have had a hand in destroying communities and now have the nerve to complain when church attendance greatly decreases in Western countries. Church attendance is in part sinking for the same reason that people are more distrustful of government than ever; these institutions contribute to the anti-White system. It should be pointed out that there’s nothing inherently anti-White about Christian churches or government. Instead, it’s the people who lead these entities that make them so and the ideas that they adhere to.  What Western Christianity needs are leaders who will defend their people and point out the injustice of White genocide.

To force integrate one group of people into the communities and/or nations of another group of people (as the globalist elites are doing with the help of the churches) is a crime against both groups of people. It’s certainly not very “Christian.” The alienation that people feel in the modern world is in major part due to the loss of community. For Whites this alienation comes from loss of community and from constant anti-White attacks on their peoplehood.  The globalist elites desire the loss of community in order to make the people more open to the creation of global government (aka the NWO).  Jesus said to bring the word to the Nations, not to wipe out the Nations. The surest way to prevent a tyrannical global government is the existence of many autonomous states, nations, city-states, regions, and principalities. This diverse set of polities would stand united in their respect for other people’s way-of-life because doing so would strengthen their own way of life.

Of course I’m more than aware that there are parties with White Nationalism who dislike Christianity. But the truth of the matter is that most Whites in the West don’t share this opinion of Christianity. It’s also worth mentioning that the pre-Christian faiths of Europe weren’t necessarily “pro-White” either. The Vikings were more than happy to sell European women to the Muslims. The Romans probably killed up to million Gaul’s in their Gaul campaigns. On this matter of Christianity and religion I think it’s best to accept things how they are and just focus on smashing the anti-White system through the Mantra message. I will however be writing in the future on how Christianity should be improved.

This doesn’t mean that I’m abandoning the White Path. The White Path may be better suited as being a supplement to religion and spirituality rather than a replacement. There are people I know who attend church on Sunday but who also go to yoga classes on Monday. There are freemasons who are strict Catholics but who take part in spiritual activities in a Masonic lodge. Rather than an entirely new religious institution, a more realistic goal would be the creation of one White Cathedral in North America and one in Europe. Pius White people would be encouraged to visit at least once every 10 years, as Scandinavians were expected to visit the temple of Uppsala every 9 years during the Viking age. The White Cathedral would act as a cultural center and place of mediation, but once a month would offer a “ritual of Whiteness.” It would include all the attributes that I described in past articles on the White Path but just be limited in scale.  Of course, if the churches refuse to reform from the path of anti-Whiteness then there may be no choice but to expand the White Path faith?  It’s partially up to the anti-White globalist elites whether or not they get to deal with Christ-like people or Thor-like people?

My main concern for the present is the destruction of the program of White genocide.  As much as I’d like to see a White “civil religion” of sorts, I must be realistic in my expectations. Prudence dictates not pushing too hard for a brand new faith. My sincere hope is that the White genocide issue can be solved as reasonable people and from a place of thoughtfulness for all (or near all) of the parties involved.  I also hope that certain parties can be helped to see that freedom of association is a basic human right and that no group of people should be forced to endure what is being experienced under the current anti-White system.

The program of White genocide will end. The question is whether it’s Jesus’s way or Thor’s way?

(1) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2014/01/05/cathedrals-rituals-heroes-and-relics-on-the-white-path/

(2) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/the-white-path/

(3) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/godthe-allthe-forcethe-uber-rotator/

(4) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/the-anti-white-system-program-for-white-genocide/

Santa Claus is Coming to Town

Every December the people in the houses I visit and live near display statues, talisman, figurines, and even shrine type arrangements of a god who comes on Christmas Night.  This god is a god of justice and hope who comes as a savior to those who remained true to the rules of his kingdom.  The King returns to save the people who remained loyal to his laws and also gives the the untrue the burning coals of hell to experience for breaking his laws. Who is this god that I describe; Jesus Christ? It could be, but specifically the being that I’m describing is the one they call “Santa Claus.”

Santa Claus is a fatherly or grandfatherly White man with a thick white beard, usually wearing some sort of clothing to protect him from the elements, and travels in a flying sled pulled by 8 reindeer.  Santa Claus’s archetype is the father god in most of the White mythologies (Norse, Greek, German, Roman).  Santa Claus is Odin (who rode an 8 legged horse), or Zeus, or Enlil. He’s the wise father. He’s the King of the Realm.

The father god has a son. The King has a crowned prince.  Uther Pendragon has Arthur.  Odin has Thor. God the Father has Jesus. Jesus is Thor (they both carry a hammer).   Jesus is Santa Claus’s son.   This god appears three times: 1) he is born (Christmas); 2) he appears in his late twenties-early thirties as Savior (Easter); 3) then he comes back in his “3^rd Coming” (although most people call it the 2^nd coming) as the father god to dispense Justice as told in the book of Revelation or in the Hindu Texts that discuss the return of the gods during the Kali Yuga. Christmas is the Celebration of the god’s birth, AND the celebration of his return on the Day of Judgment to reward his people and mete out justice to traitors and the untrue.  Easter is the celebration of this man in his late 20’s or early 30’s who acts as champion of the people.  He usually gets killed and then rises from the dead (Jesus, Thor, Conan, Flash Gordon, Arthur Pendragon).  His son takes over his duties and the cycle of father and son repeats itself.

The 3 holidays dealing with the White god(s).

1) Christmas Day: The birth of the White Christ Child (a healthy White male child as a symbol of hope).   The Christ Child comes as “The Sun” in the Tarot.

2) Easter: The White Christ rising from the dead after being executed by the enemies of the Folk (aka the generation of vipers).  The White Christ Savior comes as the “Knight of Swords” in the Tarot.

3) Christmas Eve: The King returns as the Father King god. The great White Father comes as “King of Swords” in the Tarot.

The Cycle then starts again 1-2-3

The story of Santa Claus is an allegory about the return of Odin/Zeus/Enlil on the Day of Judgement. The “kids” in the Santa story represent people on this earth.  The current Anglo-American-Judeo-Illuminati-Globalist-Elites don’t especially look forward to the coming of the Father King God. They are the “bad kids” who worked for Satan or Lucifer or Black Peter.

The following is a short documentary on Santa Claus that I recommend (insist actually) you watch before reading on:

As pointed out in the Santa documentary above, Odin returns to decide who dies and who prospers.  Saint Nickolas would punish kids who had been bad or who “couldn’t demostrate a skill” (perhaps a future Santa will test people to see if they know verses from the Mantra (1)?).

What about this figure of Black Peter?  This is a horned creature with dark features physically.   In several of the myths Black Peter appears to be employed by Santa Claus.  Black Peter is Satan captured by Saint Nikolas (Zeus, Enlil, Odin). In the English myth, black Peter is “seen in the company” of Father Christmas.  Black Peter punishes the bad kids for Santa Claus.  In the HBO series “Deadwood,” George Hearst is a representation of the White Father God in an abusive, proto-fascist, tyrant form. In Deadwood, Al Swearengen is Satan, thereby making him Black Peter in Christmas myth.  In Deadwood Swearengen ends up having to carry out Hearst’s will against his own side (by pushing Alma Ellsworth to sell her gold claim and by ordering the death of the whore “Jen”) to keep Hearst from smashing the whole camp (just as god did back in Saddam and Gomorrah when too many of the kids ended up being naughty).  The Father god makes Satan deal with his own people (the bad kids and kids who can’t demonstrate any knowledge).  Enki had to start a flood against his own kind in the Babylonian mythology.

Now after reviewing the basic mythology of Santa Claus and recognizing the vast amount of material representation he has in the Month of December, we can move to the question of how or where Santa actually exists, or may exist in the universe.

The White Rabbit (see my blog roll) was able to illuminate this author to the possibility of corporeal Nordic White beings that may be the creators of White humans (or all humans). They are large in stature, have level 2 or 3 technologies (2), and may be coming back to earth with knowledge of who has been naughty and who has been nice.   I had heard the ancient astronaut theory in undergraduate archaeology classes, but it was always framed in a way meant to discredit the idea. It wasn’t until I heard the White Rabbit discuss the Anunnaki or “Shinning Ones” that I had the ears to truly consider this possibility. These are highly advanced beings that may have created us for future purposes? Earth could be one large genetics project where these “gods” dropped us so that we would evolve into beings suitable for the missions that they have planned for us?  Just as powerful and capable people think farther ahead in time than less powerful and less capable people, these beings may make plans for 250,000 or million years in the future?   The story of Santa Claus is the story of the Great Nordic King god returning to the earth to free us (from Black Peter/Satan/Lucifer/Enki) and then illuminate us on the mysteries of the Universe.  He’ll give “gifts” to people who were “good,” and punish people who defied Santa Claus’s laws (and those who didn’t try to learn about the mysteries of the universe. These are the kids from the Saint Nick story who couldn’t display any knowledge. Maybe Santa will excuse some bad behavior if you can show you know some sort of critical knowledge? ).  If and when Odin Claus does come back, it won’t be with a sled and reindeer. I would expect some sort of super advanced spacecraft.

When writing about these gods, the lower case “g” is used because they are thought of as taking corporeal form and exist in flesh and bone.  The Highest “God” or “The All” is the ultimate force of creation.  Like humans, the Shinning Ones are part of the All, or part of the God Consciousness, but are not the God, The All, or what the freemasons call the “Architect of the Universe.”  As the White Rabbit says, the Shinning Ones are “something bigger in nature.”  They could be thought of as angelic beings but also come in female form.   They would be more knowledgeable of God/The All than humans would be. They would have the ability to affect time and space and probably consciousness itself.  Their ability to create change and manipulate the elements would appear supernatural to the human masses.  They can throw planet size chunks of rock through space.  They have life extension technology that could allow for thousands to maybe millions of years.  These Shinning Ones may be the reason that the Anglo-America-Judeo-Illuminati-Globalist-Elites are in such a rush to build their New World Order?  Black Peter and his generation of vipers may be doing all they can to prepare for the coming of Odin Claus?  I realize that this perspective on Santa Claus is unconventional. But is it any more unbelievable than what Fundamentalist-Judeo-Christians believe according to their eschatology?  If the Shinning Ones do or don’t exist in the form I described above is yet to be proven. This author gives them a 50-50 chance of being real, but if no Shinning One’s return in the next year (by December 2013), I’ll drop this percentage to a 20-80 chance.

While it is still unknown whether the White gods exist as the higher beings I described above, psychologically we can point to their existence as archetypes that people can relate to, strive to be like, and learn from.  The archetype of the Father God is a being or force of judgment, authority, and knowledge.  He’s the supreme law lord.  He’s fair but can be cruel to people who oppose his will.   He can be stubborn and given to anger at times.  He’s mostly a hands-off leader who uses his experience and wisdom as a team’s master mind. He’s a coach. He’s a master.  His son Thor/Jesus is the field marshal for the King.   In the BBC TV show “Merlin,” Arthur Pendragon carries out Uther’s orders in the field.  Uther mostly remains in the castle but will take the field when needed.

As already mentioned, The HBO series Deadwood represented this archetype in the character of George Hearst.  Hearst was portrayed as having all the worst qualities of a King of Swords.  He’s brutal, cruel, prone to anger, and absolute in believing that his WILL is Law. The creators of Deadwood are people who don’t care for the Aryan King Father God archetype.  The creators of the HBO show “Boardwalk Empire” portrayed this archetype with the character of “the Commodore.”  The Hollywood magicians are more likely to relate to the archetypes of Lucifer, Enki, Satan, Loki, or Black Peter. They feel a positive connection to the serpent, the horned god, owls, and to chimeras throughout mythology.   Their tarot type is the Devil.  On the “Day We Must Never Forget” the Devil picked “the Tower” tarot card and lightning came from above and turned Joachim and Boaz to dust.

If themagicians who work in Hollywood feel displeasure towards the Father God archetype, it means he’s a symbol of danger for them (in whatever form he exists).  The globalist power structure has directed a lot of social engineering resources into trying to delegitimize the strong father archetype.  The Father god figure epitomizes the “dead white male” that liberals and assorted anti-Whites shriek about and hate.  They fear him because they know they are going to be judged by him (whether this comes from higher beings or “regular humans” doesn’t matter). The Father god King holds the sword of Justice while the horn of Judgment plays overhead. You will know when this archetype comes to life when you see the smashing of the satanic globalist Illuminati order and the ending of the program of White genocide (3).  They will be highly competent, learned,(preferably bearded) White gentlemen, about 60-70 years old, who are skilled at learning critical information on a given situation or individual.  They see 17 moves ahead of the current move. They have vast knowledge of the Force.

The next time you see a figurine or shrine of Santa Claus during December remember who you’re looking at. The image of Santa landing his sled is just as sacred as the Christ child in the manager. Christmas represents the coming of our lord in two ways: the Christ child as a symbol of hope and purity and the Father God as a symbol of Judgment and order. Whether he comes as an advanced White being, or just as a human living out an archetype, we are in the time of the larger cycle where this force of nature is going to return.  The question you need to consider is whether you’ve been naughty or nice?  Because Santa Claus is coming to town.

Hail Santa Claus!!!

(1) http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/the-white-mantra/

(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale

(3) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/the-anti-white-system-program-for-white-genocide/

Review of Thor

For some time now I’ve been planning on writing a review of the movie Thor. After putting it off for a long time I decided that now would be a good time to write it considering the recent release of “Thor II: The Dark World.”  Many people within the White Nationalist movement have expressed their displeasure over Thor for its use of non-Whites in the role of Norse gods. They do have a point, but I believe that the movie has some interesting aspects to consider, especially for those who listen to the Follow the White Rabbit radio show and who have an interest in the subject of the White gods (1).

The movie pretty much starts out with the Norse god Odin explaining the nature of the universe to his two sons, Thor and Loki.  He talks about the last great war between the Asgardians (Norse god type people) and the Frost Giants. The frost giants were defeated by Odin and his army and their source of power was removed from their planet Jötunheim. Interestingly enough, the castle of the frost giant king was a structure that featured two towers. This got me wondering if Jötunheim was actually “Judenheim?”

So we next see the great hall of Odin and thousands of Asgardians watching the crowning of the new king of Asgard, Thor. While Odin swears in Thor to be King, three frost giants are breaking into the Asgardian weapons vault.  Somehow Odin senses this and taps his spear on the floor once which causes a giant robot called a “Destroyer” to come out and kill the three frost giants as they try to remove something called a “casket” from the vault. This “casket” is a blue brick type device which, if you look closely, has a small swastika on it. The casket is an energy device and it appears that without this device that the frost giants pose less of a threat to the rest of universe?  Next we see Odin, Thor, and Loki in the weapons vault.  Thor is calling for invasion of Jötunheim but Odin rejects the idea as foolish and unnecessary. Odin reminds Thor that he’s not the king yet, and later we see Thor reacting as a child by tipping over a banquet table.  What was interesting about this was that Thor wasn’t ready to be king, but it wasn’t Odin who stopped the crowning ceremony but “fate” or perhaps a force beyond the understanding of even the Asgardians (who appear to be the most powerful beings in the universe).  Odin could have still crowned Thor king later that day but may have read the “signs” of the frost giant break-in as a reason to wait. It appears that Odin still recognizes a power greater than himself?

While watching the world of Asgard it’s interesting to consider their technology. You don’t see cars, or spaceships, or computers, or even light bulbs. But at the same time, they have technology that allows them to live for millions of years and travel across the universe is seconds. They use fire as their main heating source.  There was no TV or radio, and they appeared to be minimalists, in that their living spaces didn’t have much except the bare necessities.  Their weapons are traditional weapons (swords, hammers, spears) and you see no firearms or guns. In an earlier scene when Odin is fighting the frost giants, you see that his spear can fire out a laser of sorts, but it’s still a spear. The Asgardians still mostly rely on hand-to-hand fighting prowess. They also ride horses.

Next we see Thor pouting over the fact that he didn’t get crowned king.  Loki uses neuro linguistic programming (NLP) to suggest (while arguing against) visiting Jötunheim and Thor falls for it.  So Thor, Loki and Thor’s friends get on horses and ride to the bifrost site. The bifrost is a counter-rotating device that can send people across the universe in seconds.  The bifrost is guarded by the Norse god Hiemdall. Heimdall in the movie is played by a black man, which takes away from the aesthetic quality of movie (a better choice would have been Kevin McKidd). The movie would have been much more powerful if they used only White actors for the parts of Norse gods, but this is the nature of our current entertainment industry so we’ll just have to deal with it (for now).

Thor and his crew get to Jötunheim and almost leave without fighting but do so after one of the frost giants insults Thor (Thor can’t take the insult and instead endangers his friends by fighting).  Right before Thor and his crew are about to get beat a rainbow light comes from the sky and here appear Odin on his eight legged horse.  This was one of the best scenes of the movie as Odin’s horse whinnies with Odin dressed in full battle gear while holding his spear in the air.  If the White gods are readying for a real invasion of earth, I do hope very much that they’ll appear like this rather than in space ships. It really delights me to picture Odin on his horse appearing over London traveling out of the bifrost. While a fleet of spaceships would be frightening to the current vipers running the earth, a giant man on an eight legged horse just seems symbolically even more distressing?  When Odin appears Thor yells out to Odin “father we’ll finish them together,” in which Odin replies “silence” as a father would to an insolent child.

After an exchange with the frost giant king, Odin zaps the frost giant king and the Asgardians fly back to Asgard. Odin and Thor argue over Thor’s actions and Thor calls Odin a foolish old man.  Odin agrees that he was foolish to think that Thor was ready for kingship and banishes Thor from Asgard. Odin removes Thor’s power which appears to be tied to his suit and hammer?  One amusing part of the argument between Thor and Odin is when Loki tries to intervene on the side of Thor and Odin just growls at him (in a way that said “I don’t want to hear your bullshit”).

Thor lands on earth and is hit by an RV being driven by a scientist name Jane. Her and her two colleagues get out of RV and find Thor on the ground.  Jane’s colleague Darcy tases Thor, but before getting tased Thor calls out to his father and tells Heimdall to open the bifrost.  Thor calls for his hammer and Darcy says “ya, we know you’re hammered.” This was quite funny.  They take Thor to the hospital where Thor starts fighting the hospital staff in the ER. Here we see that while Thor is stronger than most humans, that he’s not “superhuman” without his “power” which was removed by Odin.  He’s just a really strong dude.  The hospital staff manages to knock him out with a sedative.

When Thor was banished from Asgard Odin also threw his hammer down to earth with him.  Some locals find the hammer but no one can pick it up. A government agency called SHEILD (sort of a “Majestic 12” type organization [2]) shows up which cordons off the area and starts doing testing on the object.  After leaving the hospital Thor runs back into Jane and they go to the local diner to have breakfast. In another comical scene Thor announces that he “likes this drink” (referring to what I think is coffee) and smashes the cup on the ground of the diner while demanding another.  Jane rebukes him and makes him promise not to smash things anymore. This scene got me thinking about what the personalities of the White gods would be like if they came to earth?  I assume it could be somewhat intimating being around beings of this sort? If you’ve ever been around an Army General, or a Senator, or CEO of a fortune 500 company you can probably attest that a certain nervousness comes over you in their presence. This nervousness is probably increased 100 fold being in the presence of the powerful White gods?  I imagine when these beings meet with the highest leaders of our earth that the earth leaders feel and little wobbly in the knees? I would assume that these White gods would be extremely capable, confident, and serious and that they’re not the type of people you want to get on their bad side with?

Next we find Loki in the weapons vault investigating the “casket” taken from the frost giants. When Thor and the crew went to Jötunheim one of frost giants grabbed Loki’s arm and Loki started turning blue (like a frost giant). As Loki grabbed the casket in the weapons vault, we see him turning blue again and Odin is then heard in the background yelling “stop.”  Odin then tells Loki of the true story of his birth. Loki finds out that he’s actually frost giant and that Odin took him from Jötunheim in the hope that Loki would one day bring peace between Asgard and Jötunheim. As Loki falls into an existential identity crises Odin starts to fall into the “Odin Sleep.” One strange aspect of Loki is that while he is a frost giant, that he takes the appearance of an Asgardian. He only turns blue when he touches another front giant or touches the casket. This was never explained in the movie?

This so called “Odin sleep” appears to occur out of blue and puts Odin in a coma like state where he’s asleep for long periods of time. However, we find out later than Odin can actually see the happenings of the universe while in the Odin sleep. Odin lives for millions of years so the Odin sleep appears to be a requirement for this long life. I would speculate that if real intergalactic beings of this sort existed, that long period of space travel would be optimal for such regeneration sleep. Perhaps they get into space craft and “wake up” ten thousand years later just as humans would wake from a night of sleep.

After Odin falls into the Odin sleep and Thor is banished from earth, Loki is found sitting on throne of Asgard.  There was a great shot of Loki’s shadow with his horned helmet looking rather “devil like” while on the throne.  Thor’s friends ask Loki to bring Thor back from earth but Loki refuses. If you look to the left of Loki while he tells the friends that “Odin fell into the Odin sleep,” you can see a stylized “666” in the artwork of throne.  Here too we see the producers of “Thor” sending a message that Loki is a Satan type figure.

One good additional character was Dr. Selvig.  Selvig was from Scandinavia and was familiar with the stories of Thor, bifrost, and mjolnir (Thor’s hammer). He tries to point out how this stranger “Thor” must be a crazy person.  Of course, Jane couldn’t resist the alpha male characteristics of Thor and decides to drive the crazy man to the site where his hammer fell to earth. Thor then takes on the US government and beats up all the guards including a large black fellow that Thor takes down with an impressive drop kick.  Here again we see that Thor is stronger than most humans but not superhuman. After beating up all the government security, Thor goes to grab his hammer but can’t. He’s unable to lift the hammer of Thor and is arrested by the US government.  Earlier when Thor is banished from Asgard, Odin takes Thor’s hammer and says “whoever be worthy to carry this hammer will have the power of Thor” before throwing to earth with Thor.  It appears Thor is not yet worthy to hold his hammer.

The government now has Thor and is interrogating him.  Thor refuses to talk and the government agent leaves the room.  As he leaves Loki appears and tells Thor that Odin is dead from the strain of Thor’s actions.  Further he tells Thor that he must remain on earth if war if to be avoided with the frost giants of Jötunheim. This of course is all a lie and Loki also jabs at Thor’s vanity by saying “it was so cruel of Father to put the hammer in your reach knowing you could never lift it.” They give their goodbyes and the government agent comes back into the room. We then see Loki trying to life the hammer but is unable to do so himself. Loki was invisible to the government workers around him so he appeared to have some kind of invisibility technology?

The agent interrogating Thor is then informed that Thor has a visitor.  Dr. Selvig comes to the hammer site and tells the government that Thor’s an old colleague of his named “Donald Blake.”  The government lets Thor go and he and Dr. Selvig go to the local bar to get a drink.  I doubt that the government would be so kind to allow a man to go that just fought through 15 government agents, but the story must go on. Thor and Dr. Selvig sit down for a beer and later we see Thor carrying Dr. Selvig back to Jane’s RV where he explains to Jane that “we drank, we fought, he made his ancestors proud.”  It appears Thor could handle his drinking better than Dr. Selvig. Thor and Jane then talk by the fire. Thor explains to Jane the working of the universe and that where he’s from “magic and science are one in the same.”  Thor could have taken advantage of Jane but covers her up like a gentleman instead.

Loki is then seen in Jötunheim making a deal with the frost giants.  He explains to them that it was he who sent the instructions on how to break into the Asgardian weapons fault.  Loki says that it was “all just good fun” in his trickster way “to mess up his brother’s big day.” Loki then tells the frost giants that he will bring a handful of them into Asgard to kill Odin as he sleeps and then will allow them to take their casket back.  The frost giant king agrees.

Thor’s friends decide they have to find Thor. The four friends were Fandral, Hogun, Volstagg and the Lady Sif. Only Sif is taken from Norse mythology, as the other 3 are Marvel comic characters. The character Hogun was played by an Asian character and in the back story it is told than he’s from another world that was destroyed in the past. The character of Volstagg is played by the excellent actor who played Titus Pullo in the HBO series Rome. So the four friends go to earth and find Thor. Dr. Selvig drops his coffee when he sees the friends show up and realizes that Thor isn’t a crazy person. Loki then finds out that the four friends went to find Thor and orders the Destroyer to “make sure my brother doesn’t return.”

The destroyer comes to earth and the government agents see it first. They first think that it’s US government technology and the head agent gets on the megaphone and says “attention you’re using unregistered weapons technology.”  The giant robot then fires fire from its head and destroys the government vehicles. The government vehicles are Acura SUVs with the masonic compass as the emblem. The destroyer then walks to the town and starts destroying.  The four friends try to fight it but are no match for the giant robot. Thor then offers his own life pleading to Loki that it’s better to kill him than to kill the people in the town.  The robot smacks Thor and appears to kill him. While this happens Odin can see what’s occurring and a tear rolls down his face.  After Thor gave his life (in a Jesus like manner) we see Thor’s hammer shake loose and fly into the air.  It flies into Thor’s hand and Thor rises from the dead hammer in in the air. When we see Thor come out of the light he’s dressed in full battle uniform and Jane say “Oh-my-God!”  Thor is a god (with a small g) at that point everyone now knows it.  Thor makes short work of the destroyer. In a comical part the head government agent walks up to Thor and says “Donald, you haven’t been totally honest with me.”  Thor then grabs Jane and flies to the bifrost pick up point.

We then see the frost giants enter Odin’s bedroom. Odin’s wife “Frigg” takes out two of the frost giants with a sword before getting smacked to the side. The frost giant king is about to kill Odin when Loki then kills him. Loki set up the whole thing for him to be the hero but then Thor shows up and ruins it. Loki blasts Thor with Odin’s spear and moves to the bifrost site to destroy Jötunheim. Loki sets up the bifrost to destroy Jötunheim and freezes it so Thor can’t stop it.  Thor tries to tell Loki that he “can’t kill an entire race.” This made me think that if there is some kind of federation of space people that such a law may be in place?  Perhaps the current globalist elites are facing judgment from Odin and Thor for trying to wipe White people (See “Program for White genocide” page above) from the face of earth?  Is Loki the globalist elite’s master on earth (more on this below)?  Anyway Thor smashes the bifrost to stop Jötunheim from being destroyed but by doing so is now unable to see his love interest on earth (Jane). Thor not only sacrificed his life earlier but now ended his chance to be with the women he likes. Loki falls from Asgard in Lucifer like fashion.  The movie pretty much ends with Thor being a wiser, more humble leader of Asgard.

Overall despite its multi-racial flaws, I thought Thor was a solid movie.  It’s the first movie that features the White gods of mythology, so it’s good for White people to be exposed to this.  It’s very much a movie of fathers and sons.  It’s a movie about growing up and serving others before your own vanity.  Thor took up a Christ like role in the movie which fits well with him being a “son of god” that I described regarding the White Path religion (3).  Loki also takes up a familiar role as Satan or Lucifer. Loki is a jealous being who had a very good life but it wasn’t good enough for him. Like Lucifer, Loki wanted to be the king. He used deception and duplicity.  He was even willing to kill his brother and put his father at risk fo death just to get his own way. But again like Christ, Thor tries to forgive Loki even after all his sins against Asgard and their family.  The movie also warns us about the dangers of diversity. With good intensions Odin brought Loki into Asgard but it proved to be a very bad decision. I hope that his movie will inspire future movie makers to create a more serious movie about the White gods. There is so much potential with this subject that I can’t figure out why movie making people don’t do so?  Perhaps the real thing is coming to earth making such movies unnecessary (4)?

(1) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/09/23/the-white-gods/ and https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/09/23/the-white-gods-part-ii/

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12

(3) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/09/08/the-gods-on-the-white-path/

(4) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/08/31/the-return-of-the-high-one/

“Yea” for Stenographer’s anti-masonic rant in the House

The story about the stenographer’s anti-masonic rant in the House of Representatives already had me intrigued, but after watching the following video done by Truthstream Media (1) now I’m really intrigued. Please watch the video:

Who the hell was that guy that spoke to her before her rant? Obviously his behavior is a little strange?  Why isn’t the news media showing this footage and trying to figure who he is?  If the masons are getting threatened or at least berated on the floor of the House of Representatives, this is a serous story.  To be anyone in America you either have to be a freemason or be familiar with their ideas.  I tend to believe that there probably is a “crash course” of sorts that powerful people have to go through before being allowed to really move up the ranks of power in America or the Anglo-sphere (if they’re not already a mason). This may be a basic requirement just to get people familiar with the basic worldview, symbols, and esoteric communication methods of the “brothers.” If Lucifer exists on earth freemasonry would be the basic program of knowledge for his followers to get oriented with his plan.

Dianna Reidy (the stenographer) really said it how it is. She pointed out that the Constitution was written by Freemasons and that they “go against God.” She wasn’t lying, as the Freemasonic god Lucifer did rebel against God and is still doing so (2),(3).  What I found interesting is when she said “He is not mocked.”  This was taken from the book of Galatians where it is written:

“7 Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap. 8 For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life.”

I’ve written in the past about the HBO series Deadwood (4) and its many masonic aspects. In the 2nd season finale titled “Boy the Earth talks to,” a preacher repeats “God is not mocked” before stabbing Cy Toliver in the gut. I’ve also written (5) about how Cy Toliver is a depiction of Lucifer, who in the scene before getting stabbed was mocking God while trying to blackmail George Hearst (who himself is a depiction of the god Zeus).

Is Lucifer about to get stabbed in the gut?  I don’t know, but it seems someone is sending a message to the masons and/or their god Lucifer?

Yea Dianna Reidy

(1) http://truthstreammedia.com/

(2) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/satanluciferthe-devil/

(3) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/10/06/fraternal-organizations-and-organized-religion/

(4) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/following-the-white-rabbit-through-deadwood/

(5) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/07/15/deadwood-bonus-commentary/

Satan/Lucifer/The Devil

There’s an occasional commenter on this site who writes very long comments pushing the idea that the “good gods” from human mythology are not the White or “Aryan” gods (Zeus, Enlil, Odin, Thor), but the horned, serpent gods (Lucifer, Enki, Satan). This commenter takes a lot of time to write these posts and appears to be well read in mythology. I decided that I would write a post discussing the horned serpent god[s] and discuss why the Anglo-American-Judeo-Illuminati-Elites may have chosen to follow this being or group of beings.

As I’ve written many times in the past (1), there may be an alien being or group of beings at the top of the globalist power structure. This being or beings may have been part of a former high civilization that existed in this solar system hundreds of thousand, to millions of years ago. This civilization experienced a civil war when a faction rebelled against the prevailing order of that civilization. This war was very destructive and resulted in the end of the civilization. One or more of the surviving rebels may have remained on earth after the war with the hope of rebuilding the former high civilization.  This being who remained on earth may be the one referred to as “Satan” or “Lucifer.” The story from the bible of Lucifer rebelling against God may be referring to this event.

So the first thing the reader must understand is that this being is not the incorporeal, dark spirit in Hell that most Christians understand him to be. Instead he’s a corporeal being with flesh and blood. He may have the ability to shape shift, is associated with being a reptile, and is many times depicted as having horns. This being that rebelled against the prevailing order did not rebel against the creator God/Force of the Universe; instead he rebelled against the king of the prevailing order, who we know as the “father god” (Zeus/Enlil/Odin) from the various mythologies (this god is another corporeal being).

It’s important to understand that the followers of Lucifer don’t see him as evil. They see him as a Typhon type figure that rebelled against the tyrannical father Zeus. To the globalist elites, the father god (Zeus/Odin) is the evil one. Lucifer is a teacher of civilization. He’s a sharer of knowledge. He’s Prometheus giving humans fire (which is an allegory for technology/knowledge) against the wishes of Zeus. Lucifer may be who brought civilization to humans. After the civil war discussed above, Zeus may have repopulated earth with humans with a future plan for us when we were ready, but Lucifer may have come up from his subterranean bunker and beat him to it.  Another possibility is that Zeus (or his agents) taught us civilization but then after he left earth to attend to his affairs in other parts of the universe, Lucifer came out to corrupt his work.  Regardless of who made us or brought us civilization, Lucifer is the fellow who currently runs earth and the Anglo-American-Judeo-Illuminati-Elites (AAJIE) appear to be his most devoted followers.  The creation of global government (aka the New World Order) appears to be Lucifer’s grand plan.

There are many benefits to serving Lucifer. If you meet him it’s not in a burning pit and you most likely won’t see him in the flesh. He’s always very careful not to show his face to his followers. In fact if you see him directly you probably won’t live to talk about it. He’s likely to use agents or if he is present, it’s probably in some kind of disguise (maybe even a hologram).  Lucifer would appear to be a “Man of wealth and taste.”  What is the benefit of serving him you ask?  What do you want?  Wealth? Power? Sex? Fame? How about all of them?  You can have anything you want but a lot depends on what your utility for him in getting what he wants.  You just better remember who your master is and when he comes to collect, you better pay!  Lucifer would tell you something like “look, there is no life after death. All there is is in this life. Serve me and you can have anything you want. I’ll put you in my great history book of earth and one day when I rule the earth openly people will hear your story and how you contributed to my plan. Those who oppose me will have their histories erased forever.”  Life as a closed system (no life after death) would be one of his principal persuasive arguments. In the future he’ll probably offer life extension technology in return for service.

It’s not difficult to understand why the AAJIE followed Lucifer. I imagine he approached their ancestors like the Bibble told of Yahweh approaching the Israelites in the Old Testament.  He performed some impressive “magic” (which was just a technological display) and offered to give them great power. He was also the “only game in town” so to speak. The old stories about the old high civilization (Atlantis) were just stories. After Zeus left this solar system nothing would be able to match the power and knowledge of Lucifer in these parts. Lucifer would have told the ancestors of the globalist elites that he was the “most high” and at that time he would have been so. That is, until WWII when the Germans started making aspects of the old myths come to life. Lucifer probably had a hand in the Third Reich but later those pesky Germans starting straying away from old “Swartz Pete.”

This was probably the time when the Germans may have made contact with some of Zeus’s agents.  After the Germans starting experimenting with Bell technology, this most likely got the attention of the nearest intergalactic space Aryans (Zeus’s subordinates).  I can imagine a meeting sometime in 1946 when the Germans would have come face to face with the gods of mythology. These gods may have explained to the Germans that something “not human” was on earth and that they needed to keep this force at bay until they could return with Zeus.  Once it was known that father Zeus was returning, Lucifer would have to prepare the earth for a showdown with the father. Pushing the world into a state of global government would best be done slowly, just as the boiling frog analogy articulates. But after WWII this process was sped up with the creation of the military-industrial-intelligence-media-complex and the possible breakaway civilization discussed by author Joseph P. Farrell (2). After the events of 9-11 this process went into overdrive, for it appears Lucifer is working overtime to consolidate the earth for the return of the father.

Lucifer is as wise as a serpent and through his guidance was able to make men rich and powerful.  All the powerful civilizations through history were probably his work. He would have been in Babylon, Egypt, Greece, Rome, China, Meso-America, Persia, the Roman Church, Byzantium, Islam, Middle Ages and Renaissance Europe, the British Empire, and America. He would have met with the great powerful men from history and whispered his plans to them. This author believes that if he lives anywhere today it would be somewhere under London. It was most likely his plan to develop technology covertly on earth under the radar of Zeus for a time he would meet Zeus again in battle.  But because the Germans developed this technology first, Zeus was alerted and sent recon units.

Satan doesn’t have absolute power (nor does Zeus, only the God/Force of the Universe has absolute power). Many of Satan’s civilizations fell but he keeps moving forward to the next. Just like the character of “Al Swearengen” in the HBO series “Deadwood,” Satan just “cleans up the fucking blood stains and moves on” (as said by David Milch regarding Swearengen).  Each civilization allowed him to learn lessons for the next one. The “mystery schools” probably came from him in order to give men power who worked in his chain of command. Knowledge of “magic” and “alchemy” provides people power over others and he would have shared this with his agents. Sometimes if the knowledge starts to leak out or become too widespread, he would use his power over the secular or religious authorities to carry out a purge.  This author thinks this was the case in 1307 when the Templars were wiped out by the church and also when the Romans slaughtered the Druids.  Satan probably encouraged the French Monarchy to oppress the people while organizing the French Revolution through his masonic lodges. He plays all sides against themselves.  This author believes Satan may have lived or appeared in the temples of Saturn in the Roman Empire (this is where they kept the gold). Satan would have moved into the Roman Catholic Church after its creation.  Christianity is a Saturnarian religion as is Islam and Judaism. Much of the Old Testament is about the god Yahweh (who this author believes to be Satan/Lucifer) attempting to pass himself off as the God/Force of the Universe or as Zeus.  The Old Testament is a collection of stories known from the ancient world mixed with the tribal history of the Hebrews. When Moses met with “God” on the mountain this was actually Satan.

Lucifer is driven fundamentally by resentment and a desire to be worshiped. He is resentful of Zeus and rebelled against the father god out of vanity. He chose to rule in hell (the current earth) rather than to serve in heaven (the old high civilization). A good analogy is that Zeus is the father away from home while “uncle Lucifer” watches us.  Lucifer tries to undermine father Zeus’s rule. Lucifer lets us stay up late, drink soda all day and night, watch adult TV programs; all the while presenting us with a negative narrative about our “oppressive” father. Lucifer corrupts Zeus’s children in the hope that his children will fight against Zeus when Zeus returns to earth from his intergalactic business trip. The problem for us humans is that if Satan is too successful at corrupting us, Zeus will return from his intergalactic business trip and wipe out of stock and start anew.  This is what the story of Saddam and Gomorrah is about as well as the great flood.

Lucifer’s power on earth comes from his ability to prey on the vanities, desires, and egos of humans. He will deliver power, wealth, and fame to his followers but it always comes at a cost. People in Hollywood are a perfect example.  Katy Perry talked about selling her soul to the Devil and Bob Dylan admitted that he was holding up his part of a bargain he made with the “commander of earth and the invisible world.” The country singer Billy Ray Cyrus once talked about how his family was under attack from Satan. Seeing the news of his daughter (Miley) lately confirms this.  Here you see a girl that was brought up in the entertainment industry as an example for young girls in a fairly innocent role. Now these same girls see her pole dancing and getting dry-humped at the MTV music awards.  Satan has allowed her to be famous but at the cost of debasing her soul. Her purpose is to make sexual promiscuity cool to young girls. She also sticks her tongue out constantly which is just an assault on decency itself.  The idea is to lower young people into baseness, indecency, and into having no respect for anything but “cool” people in Hollywood and MTV. Lady Gaga has the same role but like Madonna tends to disseminate a social message of “tolerance.” Much of the entertainment industry’s presentations are littered with masonic symbols and images (3).

Satan would have some kind of technology that allows him to live for thousands of years. He most likely has invisibility technology and also hologram capabilities.  He would have a plethora of other technologies that would create effects that appear supernatural.He would have an underground tunnel network.  This author believes he also has some form of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that he takes council with. This could be the “head in a box” that AL Swearengen speaks to in the HBO series “Deadwood.” This computer would probably calculate probabilities for Satan and provide the most cold, calculated advice for Satan to consider. Some have speculated that Satan or Lucifer himself could be an automaton or cyborg.  He also has a team of “demons” (also corporeal beings) that carry out his orders. He may have demons that he keeps around all the major power figures in the world.

The best depiction of Satan on film would be Al Swearengen from HBO’s Deadwood. This depiction of Satan is good in that it makes Satan appear to be a corrupter but also a rather likable guy.  The people who work for him have access to money, security, whores, etc. but in exchange they have to follow his orders. In the first season of Deadwood Al orders Dan Dority to kill an 8 year old girl that may have been a threat to his operation. If Dority refused, he would have been the one getting killed. Al cheated people, turned out women, killed people, but overall was a charismatic figure that took care of his associates. Swearengen is depicted as a complicated person, as the figure Satan truly would be. If things weren’t complicated enough it might be the case that Satan and Lucifer may be two different beings. I wrote of this in the past pointing out how Deadwood depicted them (4). Al Swearengen was Satan while Cy Toliver was Lucifer. Al and Cy opposed each other but at the same time worked together to oppose George Hearst, who was representative of Zeus. While Al and Cy opposed each other, Cy still yielded to Al, thus showing that Satan is the authority over Lucifer. Lucifer is number two.

I recommend reading my reviews of the Deadwood series for more information (5). Other depictions of Satan in film that I recommend are “Thulsa Doom” in the movie “Conan the Barbarian” made in the early 80’s and the Character “Ming the Merciless” in the early 80’s film “Flash Gordon.”  In both of these depictions Satan is portrayed as a flesh and blood being, but not quite human. Al Pacino plays a good Satan in “Devil’s Advocate” but this depiction shows Satan as a mix of flesh in blood and supernatural being.

I hope this discussion of Satan and Lucifer has provided the reader some insight. Satan is a complicated figure that won’t appear all “bad” (he is a spreader of knowledge), but when it comes down to it, is for himself first. Regardless of how charismatic he is, Satan and/or Lucifer is about himself first. His goal is to be worshiped as a god. Any goodwill he shows people is towards his goal of domination. He’s a liar and a deceiver. He’s a corrupter of innocence. He’s a master of illusions, deceit, and duplicity. He’ll give you the world today but remove it when the winds change tomorrow. Satan pushes White genocide (see page above) today but could push “White Supremacist”  ideology tomorrow. While the father god Zeus can be called a “tyrant” himself, it isn’t in his nature to corrupt people the way Satan does. He’s not going to advocate changing human nature. With Zeus, it’s all straight forward, you follow his laws or he crushes you. If you obey, he’ll find a role for you in his plan. There’s no manipulation just the choice to obey and serve or be neutralized.  He doesn’t prey on vanity, baseness, or the vile appetites of men. The myths of Zeus show him causing a flood when children were being sacrificed. For cannibalism Zeus punished Lycaon by turning him into a wolf.  Zeus is the “all father” who requires decency and order. Satan is corrupter who allows more human “freedom,” but this “freedom” is harmful to us in the long run.

The book of revelations tells of Satan’s end and this brings up an interesting question. If Satan is the big power on earth why would he even allow a Book of Revelation to be part of the Christian canon?  The first thing to realize is that during the time of Revelation, anyone can claim to be the returning “Savior.” The reader must also realize that I use the name “Satan” to describe the Dark Lord running earth because this is a name that most people are familiar with. The Dark Lord may claim that Zeus is “Satan” or the “devil” while he is the “morning star” coming back to save his chosen.  The spiritual Satan of the Bible represents the ego, selfishness, and base feelings in humans.  The corporeal “dark lord” figure that I described would be a cultivator of the spirit of Satan described in the Bible. His presence on earth would radiate these feelings similar to a negative person entering a room who radiates negativity. The time of Revelation will feature many false prophets, signs, and wonders. It’s important to consider what these beings do and not just be impressed with a fancy display of “magic.”  It doesn’t matter who they claim they are. What matters is how they act and what their plans are for us.

Satan (aka the Dark Lord, Lucifer, Enki, Loki, Set, the Red Hippo, or whatever he calls himself) may be the great power on earth but only because something bigger than him wills it. The Dark Lord may be allowed to run loose on earth so that the father (Zeus) can observe who follows the Dark Lord and who opposes him.  The future holds the answer to this question and if you believe the bible, there will be showdown between god (Zeus) and the beast (Satan-The Dark Lord) before a new era on earth begins. This author believes this is showdown is coming soon (6) and recommends that when things start getting “supernatural” that you truly think about what is happening and not be lead to your doom by the great father of lies who, as the son of god pointed out, was a “murderer and lair from the beginning.”

(1) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/dishwashers-for-the-white-gods-and-the-final-showdown/

(2) http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/covert-wars-and-the-clash-of-civilizations-joseph-p-farrell/1114796924

(3) http://vigilantcitizen.com/category/musicbusiness/

(4) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/07/15/deadwood-bonus-commentary/

(5) Deadwood Reviews

Part 1 https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/following-the-white-rabbit-through-deadwood/

Part 2 https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/following-the-white-rabbit-through-deadwood-part-ii/

Part 3 https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/following-the-white-rabbit-through-deadwood-part-iii/

(6) ) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/dishwashers-for-the-white-gods-and-the-final-showdown/