The following post below got removed from Counter Currents Publishing. I don’t know why?
“Race is obviously critical in the WN/Pro-White worldview and organizing principle. We need to talk more about what the concept of “Whiteness” really means. But I still wonder what it is that lies beyond that? Here are some situations to consider.
Let’s say tomorrow the Anglo-American elites, which belong to an organization like this one (1), come and call a big meeting with the White Nationalist community and offer this. They offer to give White Nationalists a high level authority over 67% of the geographic space of America. They offer to give Whites the power over media, politics, popular culture, with even more power than people suppose Jews to have today. They offer to change the living locations for all non-Whites (from this 67% of the country) except in a few major cities throughout “middle America” where international commerce is conducted. We’ll say 67 present of the country is under “White Law.”
Everybody has to take a chip in their bodies to be tracked by organizations owned and ran by the Anglo-American elites (2). I’ll call this #1 “White Nationalist + chip situation.”
Here’s another scenario. An America that has FREEdom OF ASSoCIAtiON along with an end to publicly paid anti-Whiteness. A more localized political life while setting up economic flows between other traditionalist parties across the world. Teutons, Russian traditionalists, British nationalists but also Hindus, Japanese, South America indigenous Indians, North American Indians, Chinese Nationalists, Israelis and other Jews who will respect our boundaries. I call this #2 “Traditionalist-Freedom of association” situation.
What situation would you prefer #1 or #2?
I’d take #2.
I wouldn’t be able to accept (for example) the force relocation of the America Indians. Or the forced return of “African Americans” (blacks who are descended from black slaves) to Africa. I have something that I place above ultimate White racial interests. I couldn’t maliciously fuck over innocent people for my political worldview or metaphysical outlook. Something in my being does not allow me to put racial interests at the very top.
BUT HERE’S A THIRD SCENARIO!!! #3!!!. Let’s say some Ubermensch-like, White extraterrestrials land one day and say:
“OK you pasted the test. We made you and put you in this situation with non-Whites to see if you’d let yourselves get wiped out. Since you made it this long; you past the test. Now you Whites must kill off every single non-White and every single Jew in the world. Then we’ll build an intergalactic civilization with us teaching you the mysteries of the Universe while you live as colonists for us laying down our law across the universe.” I call this #3 the “Ubermensch test for US” situation.
Who would take # 3?
To the readers, at least just post the number you’d prefer, if you don’t feel like discussing it. Or feel free to discuss your choice.
End of comment
Original comment was at this story/discussion: http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/11/we-are-at-the-end-of-somethingthe-american-renaissance-interview/
[I did make some spelling and grammatical changes since originally posting this but the ideas remain the same]
Happy Thanksgiving !
Overall Christianity’s greatest contribution is the archetype of Jesus and through him, the emphasis on love, compassion, and charity. The concept of the trinity is also important in that it’s a metaphor for the nature of the universe through the workings of consciousness. However, the trinity describing the nature of universe/consciousness can be found in other traditions ranging from Buddhism (Knower, Known, Knowing) to the hermetic teachings (God, Cosmos, Space). Much of the work of independent researcher Joseph P. Farrell (who the White Rabbit calls his “main sleuth”) focuses on this tripartite aspect of consciousness. So it’s the life and teachings of Christ that makes Christianity worth following. In fact, I would say that the four gospels alone are the most superior texts of the Bible (and within these books the words of Jesus are even more superior, but not perfect).
The Old Testament is very interesting, but has nothing to do with the person of Jesus. The Old Testament has stories and allegories borrowed from Babylonian and Egyptian mythology. The book of Genesis most likely describes the god (read advanced being) Enlil/Zeus. The allegory of the Garden of Eden describes a former civilization and its corruption by Lucifer/Enki (another advanced being). The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah by Zeus was the result of Lucifer’s (or Enki’s) corruption. The rest of the Old Testament stories about God giving the law to Moses was actually Enki’s/Lucifer’s story with his chosen people. In this we see Lucifer/Enki taking credit for Zeus’s actions as told in Genesis and playing himself off as the supreme creator of the Universe (1). So the Old Testament is made up of old stories known to learned men of the ancient world and the tribal history/mythology of the Hebrews. The rest of it describes the laws that Enki/Lucifer demanded his Jews to follow (probably to gauge his follower’s devotion to him?). Both gods (Zeus and Lucifer) described as “Yahweh” in the Old Testament are not the Supreme Creator of the Universe (for a more complete understanding of the Supreme Creator or “God,” read the first footnote linked below), they’re just advanced beings or extraterrestrials (2). The Old Testament also contains the book of Psalms, which provide much practical wisdom.
The two big questions in Christianity are was Jesus an actual historical figure and who wrote the New Testament? This author doubts that Jesus actually existed, but it really doesn’t matter. The message of Jesus is still a Great Good whether such a man existed or not. If he did live, he was no more the son of God (aka the Force/Supreme creator/God) than the Roman soldier who hammered the nails into his hands on the cross. We’re all God’s sons and daughters. So if Jesus actually did live he was just a remarkable man of wisdom with great knowledge of God/The Force/the Supreme Creator. The resurrection and virgin birth were myths. If Jesus did live then the miracles done by Christ were “magic” that he performed to gain legitimacy for his message. Some speculate that during his “lost years” that he studied the mysteries in Egypt? Perhaps this is where he learned his knowledge? As I said above, this author tends not to believe that Jesus was a real person. There’s just no evidence to support it.
So then who wrote the New Testament? This question will probably never be answered. I believe some learned Greeks wrote the story of Christ for positive reasons. I believe Christ is an allegory for gaining a high state of consciences. Christ dying on the cross is a metaphor for the death of our lower, base, material self so that the higher spiritual self can ascend. This is the Gnostic Christian idea of attaining “Christ consciousness.” This is no different than the Hindu idea of discovering your Atman. You hammer your ego to the cross that your true spiritual self can arise. As far as eternal salvation, no one really knows what happens when we die. Since the universe tends to be cyclical, this author tends to believe that we too come back again in some form. The path to spiritual salvation is about finding your Christ consciousness wherever you find yourself and once you are at peace with yourself and the universe around you, then you are saved. Once your intentions are motivated purely by love, you’re saved. So Jesus is the way to salvation because being like Jesus is the way to salvation. It has nothing to do with saying some words about “accepting Christ as your savior” or taking part in dogmatic rituals.
I believe these learned Greeks probably intended on creating a spiritual movement based on hermetic and platonic ideas. I believe that once this faith started spreading, that certain powerful parties took notice. These parties probably decided that since they couldn’t stop the Christ movement, that they would capture it and take in the direction that they wanted. So this is when Paul came on the scene. Paul started pushing for organized churches. When Paul was Saul he persecuted Christians. But when Christianity started gaining steam, someone ordered Saul to become Paul in order to co-opt the teachings of Christ. Christianity became an organized religion and then merged with the Roman state. The organized Christian church maintained much of Christ’s teachings but then added the rules and sacraments to keep the people in line. You could live a life almost identical to Jesus but if you didn’t believe in taking “Holy Communion” you were “damned.”
But while the Church was an organization of oppression, superstition, and corruption there’s no doubt that the Catholic Church was critical in civilizing the West. Through its hierarchy the Church worked as a center of organization. It started institutions of learning and charitable entities. Monasteries and abbeys served their local communities. The town church had a social welfare role. When it comes down to it, the Catholic Church was the most influential organization in the history of the West. Later, the Protestants came along and enacted some needed reforms that led to increased literacy among the masses, but with them too we see witch burnings and tyrannical social controls. Overall though, Christianity did a lot to bring about the social and cultural unity of the White Western world. Most of what people called “Christendom” in say the year 1550, was what I today would call “White-dom.” Of course, today Christianity has lost much of its influence in the Western world.
Overall I have positive feelings towards Christianity but don’t care much for much of the dogmas of organized religion. This isn’t to say that I reject organized religion outright. I respect the Catholic and Orthodox denominations especially. I enjoy watching Catholic mass and Orthodox liturgy. I have great affection for Catholic and Orthodox Cathedrals and churches. If I had children I would send them to Catholic schools before I ever sent them to public schools. I grew up going to a mainline Protestant church and go to service on holidays when it is required of me by certain family members. I value a good sermon.
The only churches I feel uncomfortable in are the Evangelical churches with people holding their hands in the air, speaking in tongues, freaking out and damning people who don’t give their undying support to the state of Israel. I can’t stand the music in these churches or the dancing about (I like the old hymns, as they would have sang in Victorian England. OK I admit liking “Shout to the Lord” and “Awesome God.”). I consider the preaching of preachers like John Hagee to be black magic that does nothing but whip up people’s emotions. There’s no love in these sermons, as they’re usually just political or social screeds. If ever there were churches that were run by Lucifer himself, it’s these types. These churches only arose in the last 40 years and in this author’s opinion, are most likely the products of intelligence organizations? In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if in the future these churches totally rejected Christ outright and became Old Testament Churches that worshiped the Old Testament god and had for its Vatican the state of Israel. I don’t think the people who attend these churches are necessarily bad, I just find them to be spiritually and politically mislead. I believe the appeal that these churches have is in their political and social intertwinement. These churches make you feel like God is on your side politically and socially. The mainline Protestant churches tend to be politically liberal. So in America you have churches for the Right (Evangelical) and the Left (mainline protestant). The Catholic and Orthodox churches tend to be apolitical. This is another reason why I prefer the Catholic and Orthodox churches as institutions? There’s little to no politics.
Ok, this isn’t totally true; at least regarding covert politics. In the battle against the New World Order the Orthodox Church (outside the United States) has been a bulwark. The Catholic Church also has some strong elements that oppose the Anglo-America-Judeo-Illuminati-Elite (3). The mainline Protestants however are four-square in the NWO camp. The Evangelicals are behind the Jewish faction of the Anglo-American-Judeo-Illuminati-Elites, but do show some rhetorical opposition to the NWO (unless it’s the Jews running it, then I guess it’s OK with them?).
The one issue that all Christian churches fail on is the issue of White genocide (see page above titled “Program for White Genocide”). Not only do they remain silent on this massive injustice, but they take part in politics and activities that increases immigration into White countries. Even among conservative Evangelicals leaders you see support for so called “comprehensive immigration reform.” The White peoples of Christendom bled and died for the Christian faith but the Christian faith appears unwilling to fight for us? This is one of the reasons I’m disseminating ideas for a new religion for White people called the “White Path” (4). In this religion I include the archetype and teachings of Christ as the “son of god” Thor (with “god” meaning the All-Father Odin) (5). I take the best parts of Christianity (the teachings and archetype of Christ) and include them with a religion designed for the peoples of the White West. This new religion would be less necessary if the Churches would stand behind us in our struggle against White genocide. But unfortunately they don’t, and even claim that ethnic or racial exclusivity is against the idea of universal love that Christ preached for.
Of course, no-one is flooding Japan with non-Japanese and force-integrating these non-Japanese while claiming that the Japanese who oppose this are against universal love. And no one is flooding Israel with non-Jews and force integrating these non-Jews while claiming that the Jews who oppose this dynamic are people against universal love. This claim of lacking love isn’t directed at any non-White peoples. Only White people are accused of being against universal love for not wanting to be blended out of existence via forced integration (or for wanting spaces and institutions for themselves).
I see no reason why Whites would be any less capable of universal love for others while having spaces and institutions of our own? Certainly no one would argue that Jews aren’t able to love universally due to the existence of Israel or AIPAC? And no one would say that Africans are unable to love universally due to the existence of Nigeria, Zimbabwe or the NAACP? Only Whites are told that we’re not universal lovers for wanting spaces and institutions of our own. This is the dialectic of White genocide
Genocide (by forced diversity or any other method) is not universal love. People who deny White humans the same rights as other humans are not lovers, they’re haters. Pro-Whites have the moral high ground on this issue. I know of no one taken seriously within White Nationalism or among pro-Whites who seriously advocates denying spaces and institutions to non-Whites or even Jews? Pro-Whites are the true champions of freedom, choice, and community. If non-Whites and yes, even Jews support our rights, we will gladly do the same in return. Love between two people is based on mutual respect. Let us all live by the Golden Rule and do on to others, as we would wish done on to us. Just as humans thrive in families that they choose to form, let us not deny all humans the right to thrive in communities and nations that they choose to form. Much of the alienation that people report in modern life is caused from the loss of community. Diversity is a major cause in the loss of community in the United States (6). This is an issue that the Christian churches should stand behind us on for moral and practical reasons.
Christianity has a great message to offer, but there’s no reason to think that this message has to be in opposition to White freedom. I recommend that the churches start thinking about standing with pro-Whites on the issue of White genocide. The world is about the change greatly. Once matters are set-aright on this earth, you’re going to want to be known as among those who stood against White genocide. If you don’t, then don’t be surprised if the people of the West look to a new Path for their spiritual needs (7).
What Would Jesus Do? He would oppose White genocide.
For some time now I’ve been planning on writing a review of the movie Thor. After putting it off for a long time I decided that now would be a good time to write it considering the recent release of “Thor II: The Dark World.” Many people within the White Nationalist movement have expressed their displeasure over Thor for its use of non-Whites in the role of Norse gods. They do have a point, but I believe that the movie has some interesting aspects to consider, especially for those who listen to the Follow the White Rabbit radio show and who have an interest in the subject of the White gods (1).
The movie pretty much starts out with the Norse god Odin explaining the nature of the universe to his two sons, Thor and Loki. He talks about the last great war between the Asgardians (Norse god type people) and the Frost Giants. The frost giants were defeated by Odin and his army and their source of power was removed from their planet Jötunheim. Interestingly enough, the castle of the frost giant king was a structure that featured two towers. This got me wondering if Jötunheim was actually “Judenheim?”
So we next see the great hall of Odin and thousands of Asgardians watching the crowning of the new king of Asgard, Thor. While Odin swears in Thor to be King, three frost giants are breaking into the Asgardian weapons vault. Somehow Odin senses this and taps his spear on the floor once which causes a giant robot called a “Destroyer” to come out and kill the three frost giants as they try to remove something called a “casket” from the vault. This “casket” is a blue brick type device which, if you look closely, has a small swastika on it. The casket is an energy device and it appears that without this device that the frost giants pose less of a threat to the rest of universe? Next we see Odin, Thor, and Loki in the weapons vault. Thor is calling for invasion of Jötunheim but Odin rejects the idea as foolish and unnecessary. Odin reminds Thor that he’s not the king yet, and later we see Thor reacting as a child by tipping over a banquet table. What was interesting about this was that Thor wasn’t ready to be king, but it wasn’t Odin who stopped the crowning ceremony but “fate” or perhaps a force beyond the understanding of even the Asgardians (who appear to be the most powerful beings in the universe). Odin could have still crowned Thor king later that day but may have read the “signs” of the frost giant break-in as a reason to wait. It appears that Odin still recognizes a power greater than himself?
While watching the world of Asgard it’s interesting to consider their technology. You don’t see cars, or spaceships, or computers, or even light bulbs. But at the same time, they have technology that allows them to live for millions of years and travel across the universe is seconds. They use fire as their main heating source. There was no TV or radio, and they appeared to be minimalists, in that their living spaces didn’t have much except the bare necessities. Their weapons are traditional weapons (swords, hammers, spears) and you see no firearms or guns. In an earlier scene when Odin is fighting the frost giants, you see that his spear can fire out a laser of sorts, but it’s still a spear. The Asgardians still mostly rely on hand-to-hand fighting prowess. They also ride horses.
Next we see Thor pouting over the fact that he didn’t get crowned king. Loki uses neuro linguistic programming (NLP) to suggest (while arguing against) visiting Jötunheim and Thor falls for it. So Thor, Loki and Thor’s friends get on horses and ride to the bifrost site. The bifrost is a counter-rotating device that can send people across the universe in seconds. The bifrost is guarded by the Norse god Hiemdall. Heimdall in the movie is played by a black man, which takes away from the aesthetic quality of movie (a better choice would have been Kevin McKidd). The movie would have been much more powerful if they used only White actors for the parts of Norse gods, but this is the nature of our current entertainment industry so we’ll just have to deal with it (for now).
Thor and his crew get to Jötunheim and almost leave without fighting but do so after one of the frost giants insults Thor (Thor can’t take the insult and instead endangers his friends by fighting). Right before Thor and his crew are about to get beat a rainbow light comes from the sky and here appear Odin on his eight legged horse. This was one of the best scenes of the movie as Odin’s horse whinnies with Odin dressed in full battle gear while holding his spear in the air. If the White gods are readying for a real invasion of earth, I do hope very much that they’ll appear like this rather than in space ships. It really delights me to picture Odin on his horse appearing over London traveling out of the bifrost. While a fleet of spaceships would be frightening to the current vipers running the earth, a giant man on an eight legged horse just seems symbolically even more distressing? When Odin appears Thor yells out to Odin “father we’ll finish them together,” in which Odin replies “silence” as a father would to an insolent child.
After an exchange with the frost giant king, Odin zaps the frost giant king and the Asgardians fly back to Asgard. Odin and Thor argue over Thor’s actions and Thor calls Odin a foolish old man. Odin agrees that he was foolish to think that Thor was ready for kingship and banishes Thor from Asgard. Odin removes Thor’s power which appears to be tied to his suit and hammer? One amusing part of the argument between Thor and Odin is when Loki tries to intervene on the side of Thor and Odin just growls at him (in a way that said “I don’t want to hear your bullshit”).
Thor lands on earth and is hit by an RV being driven by a scientist name Jane. Her and her two colleagues get out of RV and find Thor on the ground. Jane’s colleague Darcy tases Thor, but before getting tased Thor calls out to his father and tells Heimdall to open the bifrost. Thor calls for his hammer and Darcy says “ya, we know you’re hammered.” This was quite funny. They take Thor to the hospital where Thor starts fighting the hospital staff in the ER. Here we see that while Thor is stronger than most humans, that he’s not “superhuman” without his “power” which was removed by Odin. He’s just a really strong dude. The hospital staff manages to knock him out with a sedative.
When Thor was banished from Asgard Odin also threw his hammer down to earth with him. Some locals find the hammer but no one can pick it up. A government agency called SHEILD (sort of a “Majestic 12” type organization ) shows up which cordons off the area and starts doing testing on the object. After leaving the hospital Thor runs back into Jane and they go to the local diner to have breakfast. In another comical scene Thor announces that he “likes this drink” (referring to what I think is coffee) and smashes the cup on the ground of the diner while demanding another. Jane rebukes him and makes him promise not to smash things anymore. This scene got me thinking about what the personalities of the White gods would be like if they came to earth? I assume it could be somewhat intimating being around beings of this sort? If you’ve ever been around an Army General, or a Senator, or CEO of a fortune 500 company you can probably attest that a certain nervousness comes over you in their presence. This nervousness is probably increased 100 fold being in the presence of the powerful White gods? I imagine when these beings meet with the highest leaders of our earth that the earth leaders feel and little wobbly in the knees? I would assume that these White gods would be extremely capable, confident, and serious and that they’re not the type of people you want to get on their bad side with?
Next we find Loki in the weapons vault investigating the “casket” taken from the frost giants. When Thor and the crew went to Jötunheim one of frost giants grabbed Loki’s arm and Loki started turning blue (like a frost giant). As Loki grabbed the casket in the weapons vault, we see him turning blue again and Odin is then heard in the background yelling “stop.” Odin then tells Loki of the true story of his birth. Loki finds out that he’s actually frost giant and that Odin took him from Jötunheim in the hope that Loki would one day bring peace between Asgard and Jötunheim. As Loki falls into an existential identity crises Odin starts to fall into the “Odin Sleep.” One strange aspect of Loki is that while he is a frost giant, that he takes the appearance of an Asgardian. He only turns blue when he touches another front giant or touches the casket. This was never explained in the movie?
This so called “Odin sleep” appears to occur out of blue and puts Odin in a coma like state where he’s asleep for long periods of time. However, we find out later than Odin can actually see the happenings of the universe while in the Odin sleep. Odin lives for millions of years so the Odin sleep appears to be a requirement for this long life. I would speculate that if real intergalactic beings of this sort existed, that long period of space travel would be optimal for such regeneration sleep. Perhaps they get into space craft and “wake up” ten thousand years later just as humans would wake from a night of sleep.
After Odin falls into the Odin sleep and Thor is banished from earth, Loki is found sitting on throne of Asgard. There was a great shot of Loki’s shadow with his horned helmet looking rather “devil like” while on the throne. Thor’s friends ask Loki to bring Thor back from earth but Loki refuses. If you look to the left of Loki while he tells the friends that “Odin fell into the Odin sleep,” you can see a stylized “666” in the artwork of throne. Here too we see the producers of “Thor” sending a message that Loki is a Satan type figure.
One good additional character was Dr. Selvig. Selvig was from Scandinavia and was familiar with the stories of Thor, bifrost, and mjolnir (Thor’s hammer). He tries to point out how this stranger “Thor” must be a crazy person. Of course, Jane couldn’t resist the alpha male characteristics of Thor and decides to drive the crazy man to the site where his hammer fell to earth. Thor then takes on the US government and beats up all the guards including a large black fellow that Thor takes down with an impressive drop kick. Here again we see that Thor is stronger than most humans but not superhuman. After beating up all the government security, Thor goes to grab his hammer but can’t. He’s unable to lift the hammer of Thor and is arrested by the US government. Earlier when Thor is banished from Asgard, Odin takes Thor’s hammer and says “whoever be worthy to carry this hammer will have the power of Thor” before throwing to earth with Thor. It appears Thor is not yet worthy to hold his hammer.
The government now has Thor and is interrogating him. Thor refuses to talk and the government agent leaves the room. As he leaves Loki appears and tells Thor that Odin is dead from the strain of Thor’s actions. Further he tells Thor that he must remain on earth if war if to be avoided with the frost giants of Jötunheim. This of course is all a lie and Loki also jabs at Thor’s vanity by saying “it was so cruel of Father to put the hammer in your reach knowing you could never lift it.” They give their goodbyes and the government agent comes back into the room. We then see Loki trying to life the hammer but is unable to do so himself. Loki was invisible to the government workers around him so he appeared to have some kind of invisibility technology?
The agent interrogating Thor is then informed that Thor has a visitor. Dr. Selvig comes to the hammer site and tells the government that Thor’s an old colleague of his named “Donald Blake.” The government lets Thor go and he and Dr. Selvig go to the local bar to get a drink. I doubt that the government would be so kind to allow a man to go that just fought through 15 government agents, but the story must go on. Thor and Dr. Selvig sit down for a beer and later we see Thor carrying Dr. Selvig back to Jane’s RV where he explains to Jane that “we drank, we fought, he made his ancestors proud.” It appears Thor could handle his drinking better than Dr. Selvig. Thor and Jane then talk by the fire. Thor explains to Jane the working of the universe and that where he’s from “magic and science are one in the same.” Thor could have taken advantage of Jane but covers her up like a gentleman instead.
Loki is then seen in Jötunheim making a deal with the frost giants. He explains to them that it was he who sent the instructions on how to break into the Asgardian weapons fault. Loki says that it was “all just good fun” in his trickster way “to mess up his brother’s big day.” Loki then tells the frost giants that he will bring a handful of them into Asgard to kill Odin as he sleeps and then will allow them to take their casket back. The frost giant king agrees.
Thor’s friends decide they have to find Thor. The four friends were Fandral, Hogun, Volstagg and the Lady Sif. Only Sif is taken from Norse mythology, as the other 3 are Marvel comic characters. The character Hogun was played by an Asian character and in the back story it is told than he’s from another world that was destroyed in the past. The character of Volstagg is played by the excellent actor who played Titus Pullo in the HBO series Rome. So the four friends go to earth and find Thor. Dr. Selvig drops his coffee when he sees the friends show up and realizes that Thor isn’t a crazy person. Loki then finds out that the four friends went to find Thor and orders the Destroyer to “make sure my brother doesn’t return.”
The destroyer comes to earth and the government agents see it first. They first think that it’s US government technology and the head agent gets on the megaphone and says “attention you’re using unregistered weapons technology.” The giant robot then fires fire from its head and destroys the government vehicles. The government vehicles are Acura SUVs with the masonic compass as the emblem. The destroyer then walks to the town and starts destroying. The four friends try to fight it but are no match for the giant robot. Thor then offers his own life pleading to Loki that it’s better to kill him than to kill the people in the town. The robot smacks Thor and appears to kill him. While this happens Odin can see what’s occurring and a tear rolls down his face. After Thor gave his life (in a Jesus like manner) we see Thor’s hammer shake loose and fly into the air. It flies into Thor’s hand and Thor rises from the dead hammer in in the air. When we see Thor come out of the light he’s dressed in full battle uniform and Jane say “Oh-my-God!” Thor is a god (with a small g) at that point everyone now knows it. Thor makes short work of the destroyer. In a comical part the head government agent walks up to Thor and says “Donald, you haven’t been totally honest with me.” Thor then grabs Jane and flies to the bifrost pick up point.
We then see the frost giants enter Odin’s bedroom. Odin’s wife “Frigg” takes out two of the frost giants with a sword before getting smacked to the side. The frost giant king is about to kill Odin when Loki then kills him. Loki set up the whole thing for him to be the hero but then Thor shows up and ruins it. Loki blasts Thor with Odin’s spear and moves to the bifrost site to destroy Jötunheim. Loki sets up the bifrost to destroy Jötunheim and freezes it so Thor can’t stop it. Thor tries to tell Loki that he “can’t kill an entire race.” This made me think that if there is some kind of federation of space people that such a law may be in place? Perhaps the current globalist elites are facing judgment from Odin and Thor for trying to wipe White people (See “Program for White genocide” page above) from the face of earth? Is Loki the globalist elite’s master on earth (more on this below)? Anyway Thor smashes the bifrost to stop Jötunheim from being destroyed but by doing so is now unable to see his love interest on earth (Jane). Thor not only sacrificed his life earlier but now ended his chance to be with the women he likes. Loki falls from Asgard in Lucifer like fashion. The movie pretty much ends with Thor being a wiser, more humble leader of Asgard.
Overall despite its multi-racial flaws, I thought Thor was a solid movie. It’s the first movie that features the White gods of mythology, so it’s good for White people to be exposed to this. It’s very much a movie of fathers and sons. It’s a movie about growing up and serving others before your own vanity. Thor took up a Christ like role in the movie which fits well with him being a “son of god” that I described regarding the White Path religion (3). Loki also takes up a familiar role as Satan or Lucifer. Loki is a jealous being who had a very good life but it wasn’t good enough for him. Like Lucifer, Loki wanted to be the king. He used deception and duplicity. He was even willing to kill his brother and put his father at risk fo death just to get his own way. But again like Christ, Thor tries to forgive Loki even after all his sins against Asgard and their family. The movie also warns us about the dangers of diversity. With good intensions Odin brought Loki into Asgard but it proved to be a very bad decision. I hope that his movie will inspire future movie makers to create a more serious movie about the White gods. There is so much potential with this subject that I can’t figure out why movie making people don’t do so? Perhaps the real thing is coming to earth making such movies unnecessary (4)?
People have been reporting (1) lately that the anti-White enemy has been changing their tactics. Instead of calling us “racist,” they are now using “White supremacist.” Here are some possible replies:
“Anytime a White person opposes the on-going program of White genocide they are called a “White Supremacist.””
Are Jews called “supremacists” for wanting Jews to survive?
Are blacks called “supremacists” for wanting blacks to survive?
Only Whites are called “supremacists” for wanting our people to survive.
This IS White genocide.
When black people advocate for their people it’s called “civil rights.”
When Jews advocate for their people it’s called “lobbying.”
When White people advocate for their people it’s called “White Supremacy.”
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
Note that this change in tactics is due to the impact that “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White” has had on the discourse.
See article at link below:
As my regular readers know, I am creating a religion for White people known as the White Path (1). My hope is that this religion will become the future organized religion for the majority of White people and be the civil religion of any future White State and/or intergalactic civilization. In creating this religion, I’ve borrowed certain concepts from other religions. When it comes to the former predominant faith of the West (Christianity), I believe the most critical aspect to borrow from it is the emphasis on love and charity. This essay will cover these aspects in relation to the White Path.
The White Path faith will include “loving thy neighbor” in its set of ideas. The White Path, as a future organization, will take part in charity and when it becomes a State religion will be integrated into the welfare state apparatus. The practitioners of the White Path will be encouraged to serve others. It was this aspect of serving the poor which caused Christianity to spread throughout the Roman Empire. The early Christians served the poor and preached a faith that favored the meek over the powerful. The Christians not only took care of poor Christians, but pagans as well. In an attempt to revive the Roman pagan system Justinian (the last pagan emperor) saw the need for a charity system run by Roman pagan priests. Justinian recognized the power that charity had in creating converts, but it ended up being too little too late for the pagan Romans.
Once White States are established, the White Path will be the main force in caring for the needy. But it gets more complicated in a multiracial environment. This has to be addressed, because at this point it will take some time before White States will become a reality. In a multiracial environment, the White Path will provide charity for Whites. It will concentrate on needy Whites in places like Appalachia. It will meet with local community leaders and figure out how the White Path can best help that community. Once Americans regain freedom of association, the White Path will help Whites stuck in diverse locations relocate to White communities. It will run White nursing homes in the large cities of America for older Whites who can’t or don’t want to relocate. It will provide health services for White children and mothers who live in American inner cities under the same circumstances. Once White States form young people will be required to put a year into a national service program that could include working in the charitable arm of the White Path. Before the White States arise, young people might do one year missions (in the White Path charitable arm) similar to how Mormons do.
The more complicated question is regarding non-whites? This author tends to believe that some charity should be extended to non-Whites as well. They wouldn’t have access to all the same services as Whites, but there should be some resources directed towards non-Whites. The need for this charity will be especially necessary once Whites start separating from non-Whites. Blacks in America will be the most vulnerable during this time, so efforts need to be made to assist them in becoming self-reliant as Whites become free of the anti-White system. The idea is to make the transition to freedom as easy as possible for everyone.
The White Path should also be involved in “environmental charity.” Large projects should be taken on such as cleaning up the Pacific garbage patch. This will require coordination with the scientific community. Cleaning up the environment will be a large aspect of White Path charity. I’ve written in the past of how the White Path charitable arm should be integrated with the welfare state apparatus. One of the tasks that needy people could perform is cleaning up trash from beaches, parks, fields, lots, roads, etc. There would also be White Path animal shelters that refrain from killing homeless animals.
Anti-Whites will object to the idea of offering charity to Whites while excluding non-Whites. Of course, there are many charities and organization that exclude an out-group, but anti-Whites don’t seem to mind them. At four in the morning the Christian TV network features an infomercial for a charity that assists Jews to move out of Russia and into Israel. So if they can do it, so can we. Also, if the White Path only extended its charity to Whites, this is still charity for a large segment of the population. What is more preferable, having White charities or not having White charities? Obviously having White Path charities is preferable seeing that it results in charity that wouldn’t have existed without them.
Anti-Whites will also claim that the faith (The White Path) could never be considered a religion of love if it advocates for spaces exclusively for White people. This argument is incorrect. Pro-Whites feel an urge, allotted to us by Creator of the universe, to work towards the survival and amelioration of White humans. There’s no reason why doing this will make anyone else worse off. In fact, because Whites will have an environment designed for optimal White creativity, this will result in large quantities of scientific advancement. While Whites advance, we will pull everyone else up as a result. So opposing White freedom is opposing advancement for all humans. This means that anti-racism (besides being a code word for anti-White) is also, by extension, a code word for anti-humanity.
Anti-Whites will also claim that we only want to form White collectives so we can kill everyone and “take over the world.” This claim may be a bit of projection from anti-Whites but it should be addressed anyway. We on the White Path want to make White people better physically, mentally, and spiritually. While killing other out-groups can potentially improve us in terms of the resources gained, this will result in extreme damage to Whites mentally and spiritually. Any gain of resources that killing or enslaving large groups of non-Whites will bring, will be thoroughly erased by the trauma caused from all the killing and suffering. Killing people, even for a “just cause,” can and does result in damage to the mind and spirit of the people doing the killing.
We on the White Path advocate for loving other humans (all other humans) but not at the cost of White genocide. We will attempt to alleviate suffering for all people but will not accept forced integration and assimilation. If our “neighbor” is in need we will help how we can but helping doesn’t mean making our own “house” worse off. What anti-Whites want is for us to open our houses to all and every stranger to plunder and when we point this out they claim we’re “haters.” We will live by the golden rule in that we will treat others as we wish to be treated. Just as we wish to have institutions and spaces to follow our destines, we will not deny this right to anyone else. For the people (or other beings) who can’t be persuaded to extend to us the golden rule, we will in turn extend to them the Old Testament rule of an “eye for an eye.”
Of course, there will also be White Nationalists who will express great displeasure at my suggestion that we should love all people (yes even Jews) and provide charity to non-Whites. Many of the most offensive White Nationalists are usually agents for law enforcement, intelligence organizations, NGOs (like the SPLC ), or individual anti-Whites who just wish to poison our discourse and create an atmosphere of negativity. I’m not expecting to change the most vile characters in White Nationalism, but I do think it’s important to discuss this point for others to think about.
The nature of the universe is consciousness. From quantum mechanics we know that the observer affects the observation. The observer and the observed are connected. Consequently, hating someone else is hating yourself. While loving someone else is loving yourself. So for your own well-being it’s better to approach the world from a place of love. Of course, lots of people talk about “LOVE” these days and these people tend to be some of the biggest haters I’ve ever seen. Many so called “anti-racists” claim to be filled with “LOVE,” but then a minute later justify the genocide of White humans. These people’s true source of intent is hate, but this is accepted hate because the current zeitgeist frames so called “racists” as the worst thing anyone can be in the world. Anti-Whites are correct in pointing out that there are some White Nationalists/pro-Whites who are motivated by hate. But what these anti-Whites fail to see is that they’re actually no different from the hateful White Nationalists. They just direct their hate at a different target. It’s no mistake that the most successful pro-White/WN leaders tend not to fall into the “nigger bashing” crowd. They tend to be people who fully appreciate the potential of White humans and are motivated by the desire to see this potential fully optimized. The people who spend all their time discussing the dysfunctions of blacks or the negative qualities of Jews tend to be the least efficacious when attempting to address the problem of the anti-White system. It’s almost like White survival is secondary to the relief they get by bashing non-Whites?
The White Path’s highest law is its mission allotted by the Creator of the Universe that commands us to guarantee the survival and amelioration of Whites. This author believes that our mission will be more successful if we approach it from a place of love, which includes love for those out of our in-group.