How about the Swiss start acting like the Ukrainians?

There’s an excellent article posted at White Genocide Project that illustrates perfectly how the program of White genocide works.  It also shows how the elites running the Western world don’t give a fig about so called “Democracy.”  Read the following article (1). My thoughts continue bellow.

The European Union has frozen all research grants for Swiss universities, worth millions of euros, and also removed Switzerland from taking part in student exchange programs. This comes as a retaliation to a recent referendum, where the majority of Swiss citizens voted for more restrictions on immigration.

Swiss universities had expected this to happen, in retaliation to the cap on immigration. Switzerland is estimated to lose up to 80 to 100 million francs in research grants from the vengeful EU leaders, who care little for science, so long as they have power.

An EU spokesman announced this agenda a day after Swiss politicians declined migrants from Croatia.

The Swiss government could not accept the proposal because of the February 9th referendum – which stopped unrestricted movement of migrants and imposed quotas on immigration.

EU leaders also have stopped talks about supplying Switzerland with electricity, in an attempt to “change” people’s minds.

Switzerland is a good example of a White country that does not want open borders because it will destroy the people of their country and replace them with a different people.

Most White countries hate all these open borders and massive non-White – and White – immigration pouring into our countries and reducing our living standards all so the rich can get richer.

However, our issue here is more about the survival of a group of people. All and ONLY White countries are expected to have open borders which allows millions of non-White third world immigrants to flood it.

Meanwhile, at the same time, All and ONLY White countries are expected to adopt these millions of non-Whites into their neighborhoods, schools, and families in an effort to blend White people with non-White people and bring about this “mixed-race future” that anti-Whites so love to talk about.

This all leads to a world without White people because : there will still Black people in Africa, there will still be Oriental people in Asia, there will still be Mestizos in South America. The ONLY countries that are affected by these policies that lead to White genocide, are, of course, WHITE countries.

The Swiss people voted against open borders. This was a legal democratic election in which the people expressed their wishes. But now the globalist elites (2) running the EU are attacking the economy of Switzerland and threatening the Swiss people with a steep price for voting for Swiss interests. This tyrannical action by the globalist elites is similar to the prop 187 situation in 1994. During that act of anti-White tyranny, Californian voters voted (in a democratic election) to prohibit illegal aliens from receiving educational, social welfare, and health benefits. This was later overturned by the courts which called it “unconstitutional” (3).  The globalist elite’s use any method at their disposal to accomplish their goal of global government (NWO) with them sitting at the top of the pyramid (with us “profane” “goyim” fitted into bricks to fit in the rest of the pyramid under them).

Meanwhile in the Ukraine these same globalist elite’s support people (that they would normally call “fascists”) who attack people with clubs and bombs (4).  The protests started in Ukraine after the democratically elected leader of that country decided to postpone signing a trade deal with the EU, which would give the globalist power structure more influence in the country and more ability to encircle Russia (5). The truth of the matter is that the EU deal was only a pretext for the global elites to start trouble in the Ukraine using their NGOs that specialize in inciting demonstrations (6).

So since the people in the Ukraine are free (according to globalist leaders and media) to riot and kill people for disagreeing with the policies of their elected leaders, why don’t the Swiss people do the same?  The injustice in Switzerland is much greater than the injustice in the Ukraine. The Swiss people voted in a democratic election and are being punished for it. The situation in the Ukraine stems from their President deciding that more discussions were needed to see if Russia offered a better deal than the EU. For this, the globalist forces are willing to support street violence and probably even civil war in Ukraine.

So maybe it’s time that the Swiss people start doing what the Ukrainian protestors are doing?  Certainly people like John McCain will support them?  Won’t he?  He’s all for so called “democracy,” isn’t he?  Certainly the American media will give biased coverage in favor of the Swiss demonstrators just like they’re doing for the Ukrainian demonstrators, won’t they?  Of course not! If the Swiss people acted like the Ukrainian rightwing “demonstrators” people like John McCain would be calling for blood against these “naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews.” This comparison between Ukraine and Switzerland illustrates perfectly the globalist strategy. They need to force blend White peoples and countries out of existence by forced diversity and they need to gain hold of Russia (Putin’s Russia has been a constant thorn in the side of the globalist elites). This also illustrates perfectly how you can’t believe a word out of the mouths of the globalist elites or their media organs.

The Anglo-American-Judeo-Illuminati-Globalist elites (7) are truly children of Lucifer (8). They are evil of the vilest kind. They are cultivators of deceit, duplicity,and deception. They are against democracy, choice, and actual diversity. They support human rights offenders one day and then make up human rights offenses against others the next.  They are the source of almost all the suffering in the world today. The only good news relating to them is while they will cause much suffering on the way, they’re about to go down in Biblical proportions. The Almighty God will not tolerate such behavior indefinitely. Let us pray we can be His instruments.

Heavenly Father, allow us to be your instruments in removing the satanic globalist elites from the earth. Allow us to scrape this scum from the earth like feces from the bottom of our shoes. Let us smash their structures so Your light may shine on and evaporate their cesspools. May we rip them out by their roots, from our presence, just  as we rip weeds from a garden. In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Sprint we pray. Amen.   

Watch video explaing situation in the Ukraine:

(1) http://whitegenocideproject.com/eu-hates-democracy-for-white-countries/

(2) http://beforeitsnews.com/power-elite/2013/03/globalists-concentrated-in-4-cities-ny-dc-london-hollywood-2441680.html

(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_187

(4) http://www.ibtimes.com/euromaidan-dark-shadows-far-right-ukraine-protests-1556654

(5) http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/18/world/europe/ukraine-protests-explainer/

(6) http://www.globalresearch.ca/exposed-viral-i-am-a-ukrainian-video-produced-by-pr-company-linked-to-regime-change-ngo/5370072

(7) ) http://beforeitsnews.com/power-elite/2013/03/globalists-concentrated-in-4-cities-ny-dc-london-hollywood-2441680.html

(8) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/satanluciferthe-devil/

Verrrry Interesting

Today I made a comment at Counter Currents Publishing in reply to a post titled “White Extinction”(1).  The basic argument of the post was that Whites are facing extinction and are in need of a homeland.  Here was my comment:

I believe we need White spaces and institutions to guarantee survival.  When it comes to White spaces, the options are either White areas within multi-racial countries or outright White countries.  I agree that an outright White country would be more efficient in maintaining survival, my concerns are with the cost of achieving these all White countries.

What is the cost of partitioning lets say 2/3 of America for Whites only?  How many people are you willing to see die (Whites and non-Whites) to achieve it?

White Nationalists overwhelmingly believe that the Jews rule the Western world. I once thought this way as well, but now realize the situation is (unfortunately) more complicated. It’s more likely that the Western world is ruled by several factions, one of which is world Jewry, but the others being masonic “WASP” Anglo-American elites (with the head being British aristocracy) , and the other being Continental European (with the head being German). In general the Jews and masonic WASPs tend to be aligned. The Continental European side tends to have stronger connections with the Catholic Church and in the last 20 years with Russia.

The last time this group did battle was WWII and since 1945 we’ve had a period of peace. But since the early 2000’s this period of peace has started to unwind.

So what happens when the Anglo-American masonic WASP side starts to see itself loosing its position and decides that its only hope to retain power is to offer North American Whites a “deal.”  Lets say they give Whites full power over the military and the right to force non-Whites off 67% of the land mass of the US.  Mormonism would be the State religion and you’d have to pledge you fealty to the British Royal family. After this new White State is established, the population would have to go to war against the Continental Europeans to “smash the Huns and mongol Russians.”    Over time you’d have to take a chip in your hand, but this would just be to “keep the children safe.”

How many of you would take this deal to get a White State in North America?  What aspects would you reject (Mormonism?, the chip?, war with Europe and Russia?) .

One more question:  Lets say Americans were given total freedom of association (meaning the right to communities, institutions, businesses with who they wanted) and there was end to State financed anti-Whiteness (including a moratorium on non-White immigration) . How many here would still fight for an all White State?

My take on it is this, as much as I’d like an all White State in North America, the cost of getting it would probably be too great. So instead, I’d see total freedom of association and the institutions (media, educational, spiritual) to make White people better off. Then over time as White communities join other White communities, slowly Whites may wish to form something new.  This will be a slower process.  A more organic process to White Statehood.  This way would eliminate the death and suffering involved in cutting out a new White state in North America. It would also greatly reduce the chances for power elites to use us for their bigger plans.

When I checked back at Counter Currents to see if it generated any discussion, I found that at least half of it was erased. Here’s what made it though CC moderation:

I believe we need White spaces and institutions to guarantee survival. When it comes to White spaces, the options are either White areas within multi-racial countries or outright White countries. I agree that an outright White country would be more efficient in maintaining survival, my concerns are with the cost of achieving these all White countries.

What is the cost of partitioning lets say 2/3 of America for Whites only? How many people are you willing to see die (Whites and non-Whites) to achieve it?

One more question: Lets say Americans were given total freedom of association (meaning the right to communities, institutions, businesses with who they wanted) and there was end to State financed anti-Whiteness (including a moratorium on non-White immigration) . How many here would still fight for an all White State?

My take on it is this, as much as I’d like an all White State in North America, the cost of getting it would probably be too great. So instead, I’d see total freedom of association and the institutions (media, educational, spiritual) to make White people better off. Then over time as White communities join other White communities, slowly Whites may wish to form something new. This will be a slower process. A more organic process to White Statehood. This way would eliminate the death and suffering involved in cutting out a new White state in North America. It would also greatly reduce the chances for power elites to use us for their bigger plans.

Here’s the parts that were removed:

White Nationalists overwhelmingly believe that the Jews rule the Western world. I once thought this way as well, but now realize the situation is (unfortunately) more complicated. It’s more likely that the Western world is ruled by several factions, one of which is world Jewry, but the others being masonic “WASP” Anglo-American elites (with the head being British aristocracy) , and the other being Continental European (with the head being German). In general the Jews and masonic WASPs tend to be aligned. The Continental European side tends to have stronger connections with the Catholic Church and in the last 20 years with Russia.   

The last time this group did battle was WWII and since 1945 we’ve had a period of peace. But since the early 2000’s this period of peace has started to unwind. 

So what happens when the Anglo-American masonic WASP side starts to see itself loosing its position and decides that its only hope to retain power is to offer North American Whites a “deal.”  Lets say they give Whites full power over the military and the right to force non-Whites off 67% of the land mass of the US.  Mormonism would be the State religion and you’d have to pledge you fealty to the British Royal family. After this new White State is established, the population would have to go to war against the Continental Europeans to “smash the Huns and mongol Russians.”    Over time you’d have to take a chip in your hand, but this would just be to “keep the children safe.” 

How many of you would take this deal to get a White State in North America?  What aspects would you reject (Mormonism?, the chip?, war with Europe and Russia?) . 

As you the reader can see, there’s nothing in my comments that are vulgar, or violent, or combative. I was perplexed over why this part would be edited?  But then I remembered another comment I posted at CC that was erased outright (never made it through moderation)(2). Here’s what I wrote in that post:

“Race is obviously critical in the WN/Pro-White worldview and organizing principle. We need to talk more about what the concept of “Whiteness” really means. But I still wonder what it is that lies beyond that?  Here are some situations to consider.

Let’s say tomorrow the Anglo-American elites, which belong to an organization like this one (1), come and call a big meeting with the White Nationalist community and offer this. They offer to give White Nationalists a high level authority over 67% of the geographic space of America. They offer to give Whites the power over media, politics, popular culture, with even more power than people suppose Jews to have today. They offer to change the living locations for all non-Whites (from this 67% of the country) except in a few major cities throughout “middle America” where international commerce is conducted.  We’ll say 67 present of the country is under “White Law.”

BUT

Everybody has to take a chip in their bodies to be tracked by organizations owned and ran by the Anglo-American elites (2). I’ll call this #1  “White Nationalist + chip situation.”

Here’s another scenario. An America that has FREEdom OF ASSoCIAtiON along with an end to publicly paid anti-Whiteness.  A more localized political life while setting up economic flows between other traditionalist parties across the world.  Teutons, Russian traditionalists, British nationalists but also Hindus, Japanese, South America indigenous Indians, North American Indians, Chinese Nationalists, Israelis and other Jews who will respect our boundaries. I call this #2 “Traditionalist-Freedom of association” situation.

What situation would you prefer #1 or #2?

I’d take #2.

I wouldn’t be able to accept (for example) the force relocation of the America Indians. Or the forced return of “African Americans” (blacks who are descended from black slaves) to Africa.  I have something that I place above ultimate White racial interests. I couldn’t maliciously fuck over innocent people for my political worldview or metaphysical outlook. Something in my being does not allow me to put racial interests at the very top.

BUT HERE’S A THIRD SCENARIO!!! #3!!!.  Let’s say some Ubermensch-like, White extraterrestrials land one day and say:

“OK you pasted the test. We made you and put you in this situation with non-Whites to see if you’d let yourselves get wiped out. Since you made it this long; you past the test. Now you Whites must kill off every single non-White and every single Jew in the world. Then we’ll build an intergalactic civilization with us teaching you the mysteries of the Universe while you live as colonists for us laying down our law across the universe.”   I call this #3 the “Ubermensch test for US” situation.

Who would take # 3?

To the readers, at least just post the number you’d prefer, if you don’t feel like discussing it. Or feel free to discuss your choice.

So after reading over this comment, I started comparing the two. I looked for aspects that were in the first comment removed that matched the parts that were edited from the latest. From comparing the two it seems that my offenses were in mentioning the Anglo-American-masonic “WASP” elites (3) and from my speculations of possible scenarios in which the Anglo-American-Masonic “WASP” elites could create an all-White homeland in North America if they were faced with the threat of loss of power or loss of existence. I believe the following two words sum up this situation perfectly (watch video below):

(1) http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/02/white-extinction/#more-45475

(2) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/11/28/happy-thanksgiving-pilgrims/

(3) https://wikispooks.com/ISGP/organisations/Pilgrims_Society02.htm

*Note: Despite this “verrry interesting” observance, I believe Counter Currents is the best White Nationalist website (outside of the BUGS-White Rabbit sphere) in the world today. I recommend donating to their website.

https://secure.counter-currents.com/donate/

 

The “Dark Enlightenment”

Lately I’ve been examining the so called “Dark Enlightenment” (DE) movement. Since some pro-White/WN entitles are getting grouped with the DE, I thought I’d better investigate this phenomenon (especially considering the recent media coverage [1]).  Here are my thoughts at this point. I have 3 major points.

1) First of all the term “Dark Enlightenment” is a contradiction. By definition enlightenment can’t be dark. By using the term “DE” you play into the enemy’s playbook. We are not the side that demands another group of people get force-assimilated out of existence. We’re not the ones looking to demonize the culture of others in order to weaken and destroy them. We’re not the ones advocating global government. We’re not the ones pumping a degenerate toxic culture into the minds of Western youth. We’re not demanding that certain political speech be made illegal. We’re not the ones advocating jail time for disagreeing with certain versions of historical events. We are the true champions of choice and freedom. We’re the advocates of true diversity. We also value community, beauty, and order.

Our enemies are the side of ugliness, forced diversity which leads to homogeneity, and disorder. They’re the ones who have to lie and force people to live according to their world view. They have to spend trillions of dollars pushing the anti-White narrative in the media and education systems. They have to over report White-on-non-white crime and under report non-white-on-White crime. They have to push the sex wage gap myth.

All we have to do is tell the truth. All we have to do is point out that “anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.” All we have to do is attack their “pretty lies.”

2) The word “Cathedral” as a label for the enemy is wrong. The Gothic cathedral is probably the greatest artistic-symbolic achievement of Western civilization. To call the enemies of the West “the Cathedral” is offensive. A better term would be “the regime.” An even better name is the Forces of Satanic Darkness. ”

These first 2 points I can live with if they prove effective. But my 3^rd point relates more to ideology than terminology.

3) The DE movement is basically a right wing movement. Its major premises are as follows:

1. People are not equal. They never will be. We reject equality in all its forms.
2. Right is right and left is wrong.
3. Hierarchy is basically a good idea.
4. Traditional sex roles are basically a good idea.
5. Libertarianism is retarded.
6. Democracy is irredeemably flawed and we need to do away with it.(2)

I can agree with this list for the most part. While people are unequal they should be equal under the law. Traditional sex roles are preferable but if the greatest theoretical physicist in the nation is a woman, then she should be encouraged to do physics.  Libertardianism is indeed retarded (enough said).  Outright democracy is flawed, but at the local level democratic procedures are preferable.

My problem comes from the premise that “right is right and left is wrong.”  There are certain policies and philosophies that come out of the left that are clearly superior to the right (workers’ rights, environmental protection, minimum wages, social welfare services for people and families in need, animal rights, etc.). If you mix this premise of “right is right” with the premise “hierarchy is basically a good idea” then you get a society that looks like Norman England where people get their hands chopped off for removing a dead branch from the lord’s forest. I envision a drone leaving a neo-Norman keep to drop munitions on someone who tampered with his embedded tracking microchip.

From reading DE blogs I do notice a strain of  blatant elitism and disdain for the masses. At this point I haven’t detected what forces could be behind the DE movement but will now state that we should remain vigilant to the possibility of the Anglo-American (read “American” as the Eastern Establishment) elites using this movement as a vehicle to retain power.  In other words, the Anglo-American elites may say

“OK, you don’t want multiculturalism, Judaics running loose, white genocide; you say you want your “traditional society,” that’s OK, we’ll give you that, we’ll also give you a hierarchical structure that is very “traditional” mwaaahahaa… remember, head man gets the first fruit….mwaahahaha.”

Then over time the Anglo-American elites will let some Judaics back into the country that will lead a revolution overthrowing some drunken monarch that is set up for the purpose of being overthrown, and then White genocide and the whole foul cycle will start over again.  That’s why I suggest taking that which is “right from the right and that which is right from the left.”

You end forced diversity,neutralize out-of-control Judiacs, end White genocide, end cultural degeneracy, promote traditional values and culture; BUT also include the best aspects of the left (i.e. workers’ rights, environmental protection, minimum wages, certain social welfare services for people and families in real need, animal rights, etc).  You promote local capabilities and let local people determine the needs of local folks. You build a society that promotes economic stability (through the policies from the left) and cultural/spiritual stability (through the policies of the right). You build a society that is very difficult to subvert because it makes almost all parties content.

But where does this disdain for the masses come from?  And haven’t we seen this before?  Does not the current batch of Western “leaders” refer to the masses as “goyim” and/or “profane?” I will admit that when I first became aware of the forces that make this world operate that I too could become disappointed at the masses inability to see this as well. But I now realize that this sight is a gift. This author does not have the gifts necessary to frame a house, read Sanskrit, tap dance, write software, or do heart surgery. The Almighty has seen fit to make my gifts that of sight and of joining-matters-aright (3) (4). A harmonious, well order society is one where everybody plays a role utilizing their gifts allotted to them by the Creator. A society run by a bunch of haughty aristocrats or boyars is not only morally wrong and unjust, but it provides an opening for the most parasitical factions to enter (as seen in the French and Bolshevik revolutions). The DE has some promising ideas and intelligent people pushing these ideas, but woe to any movement that would act as vehicle for the current globalist elites (5) to retain power.

[1] http://www.vocativ.com/12-2013/dark-enlightenment-creepy-internet-movement-youd-better-take-seriously/

(2) http://www.xenosystems.net/premises-of-neoreaction/

(3) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/09/28/so-you-want-to-save-america/

(4) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/tag/king-of-the-united-states-of-america/

(5) http://beforeitsnews.com/power-elite/2013/03/globalists-concentrated-in-4-cities-ny-dc-london-hollywood-2441680.html