Systems and Symbols

Joining Matters Aright

King of the United States of America

kingofUSARecently an article was published at the Politico website in which the author (MICHAEL AUSLIN of the America Enterprise Institute) made an argument for a King/Queen or “First Citizen” of the United States (1).  The role of the King/Queen he described was mostly symbolic and ceremonial.

The purpose of this article is to discuss the idea of a King/Queen (or First Citizen) of the United States.

If there was to be an American King/Queen or “First Citizen” their main purpose would be to serve the citizens of the United States by defending them against the elites. They would be the #1 advocate for the people’s interests. They would openly stand against the most parasitical and exploitive elements of the political and left and right as well as vehemently opposing the forces pushing the US (and the world) into global government.

From the right the King/Queen would defend the people against the corporatist and militarist elements (aka the “military-industrial-complex”). He/she would advocate for better wages and better benefits for working people. The First Citizen would advocate for a national healthcare system. He/she would oppose the creation of genetically modified foods. The King/Queen would defend the environment from corporate polluters. The King/Queen would be a promoter of small and mid-size businesses. He/she would oversee an education system that is capable of creating enough people in the STEM fields to make the United States non-dependent on foreign migrants to do this work. The King/Queen would keep its citizens from fighting unnecessary wars for corporate, Zionist, and/or globalist interests.

From the left the Queen/King would defend the people against the forces of cultural Marxism and political correctness. She/he would oppose anti-Whiteness and cultural degeneracy. She/he would defend freedom of speech. She/he would advocate states’ rights and freedom of association. She/he would defend the traditional family and the right to bear arms. This First Citizen would fight for the people’s right to not be spied on by intelligence agencies for no reason. The Queen/King would fight to greatly limit immigration and work to reform the immigration laws in a way that would benefit the working people of the US.  The Queen/King would expose and fight the major forces that attempt to push the United States into globalist entities like the so called “North American Union.”

The institutions that the King/Queen would work closely with to bring about and maintain these arrangements would be labor unions, small business councils, educational institutions, churches, and non-governmental organizations. These institutions are populated by the people and work to benefit the people. The First Citizen would work close to the people in order to remain in touch with them. Less time would be spent in elite circles and elite organizations. In fact, it’s best if the King/Queen spent no time socially with the elites.  When it comes to the American elites or aristocracy (celebrities, economic elites, eastern establishment, media figures, political families), it would be all business.

The First Citizen would have veto power over the President. They should serve for 20 years and (as AUSLIN suggests in his article) be “nominated by the serving First Citizen himself, approved unanimously by the speaker and minority leader of the House and the majority and minority leaders of the Senate and ratified by a unanimous Supreme Court.” They should live in a Gothic style castle  in Washington DC. They would also have a second castle near the mean population center of the United States and a third on the West coast. In the Senate/House chambers they would have a throne that would sit in a place that would suggest high importance relative to everyone else. Every six months the King/Queen would have a sort of “question time” with the President, House Leaders, Senate Leaders, Supreme Court Justices, and any department heads that he/she calls on. This would take place in the castle in DC and the King would sit on a throne while the national leadership stood in front of him/her.  The King/Queen would question these leaders based on the concerns of the citizenry.

The one feature that I’m still pondering is whether or not they should wear a crown? For now I’ll say “yes,” and this crown would be worn during special events like the “question time” and the “State of the Union” and other national ceremonial events.  The King/Queen would be crowned in the National Cathedral in Washington DC by the clergy of his/her choice.  The King/Queen would swear a solemn oath before Almighty God that he/she will defend the interests of the American people before all others. This oath should explicitly ask the Almighty to strike them down for reasons of corruption and/or treason against the American people.

The First Citizen should be married with kids.  The spouse of the First Citizen would be known as the King or Queen “consort.”  They should be a veteran. They should not be a Freemason.  They should be formally educated (at least a bachelor’s degree) but should not have attended an Ivy League school.  They should not have held political office.  They should be at least a “nominal Christian” in that they would recognize Christianity as the dominant American cultural religion and be sympathetic to the basic philosophies of Jesus Christ.  The King/Queen and their family should be a model for all other citizens to look up to.

In contrast with the King/Queen I envision, The First Citizen described by Mr. Auslin really has little purpose. In fact his kind of King/Queen would be a propaganda figure that the people would find distraction in that would keep the attention off the actions of the elites that Mr. Auslin serves. This is what the Monarchy of Great Britain does. The British Monarchy is very popular and people feel pride about them. But the truth is that this monarchy does nothing to quell the power of the elites and, in fact, is even in league with them. The kind of First Citizen (and First Family) you could expect from Mr. Auslin’s ilk would either come from within  the American elite (who tend to be related to the British monarchy) and/or be a model multiracial/multicultural American “new man/womyn” and “new family” (multi-racial couple with a pair of adopted kids from Haiti and Cambodia) to help in the social engineering campaign.

The King/Queen or First Citizen that I described would serve the people first and put the elites in check.  That is why (just like my suggestions in my article on How to Save America [2]) this will probably never happen?  But just like my article on how to save America, I felt it my duty to write this just so nobody can ever say that I didn’t try to provide a better solution.

(1) http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/01/america-needs-a-king-101691.html#.UttQ2RAo7IU

[2] https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/09/28/so-you-want-to-save-america/

Look for future articles on monarchy to come out soon at SS.

Advertisements

Single Post Navigation

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: