WWJD?
Overall Christianity’s greatest contribution is the archetype of Jesus and through him, the emphasis on love, compassion, and charity. The concept of the trinity is also important in that it’s a metaphor for the nature of the universe through the workings of consciousness. However, the trinity describing the nature of universe/consciousness can be found in other traditions ranging from Buddhism (Knower, Known, Knowing) to the hermetic teachings (God, Cosmos, Space). Much of the work of independent researcher Joseph P. Farrell (who the White Rabbit calls his “main sleuth”) focuses on this tripartite aspect of consciousness. So it’s the life and teachings of Christ that makes Christianity worth following. In fact, I would say that the four gospels alone are the most superior texts of the Bible (and within these books the words of Jesus are even more superior, but not perfect).
The Old Testament is very interesting, but has nothing to do with the person of Jesus. The Old Testament has stories and allegories borrowed from Babylonian and Egyptian mythology. The book of Genesis most likely describes the god (read advanced being) Enlil/Zeus. The allegory of the Garden of Eden describes a former civilization and its corruption by Lucifer/Enki (another advanced being). The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah by Zeus was the result of Lucifer’s (or Enki’s) corruption. The rest of the Old Testament stories about God giving the law to Moses was actually Enki’s/Lucifer’s story with his chosen people. In this we see Lucifer/Enki taking credit for Zeus’s actions as told in Genesis and playing himself off as the supreme creator of the Universe (1). So the Old Testament is made up of old stories known to learned men of the ancient world and the tribal history/mythology of the Hebrews. The rest of it describes the laws that Enki/Lucifer demanded his Jews to follow (probably to gauge his follower’s devotion to him?). Both gods (Zeus and Lucifer) described as “Yahweh” in the Old Testament are not the Supreme Creator of the Universe (for a more complete understanding of the Supreme Creator or “God,” read the first footnote linked below), they’re just advanced beings or extraterrestrials (2). The Old Testament also contains the book of Psalms, which provide much practical wisdom.
The two big questions in Christianity are was Jesus an actual historical figure and who wrote the New Testament? This author doubts that Jesus actually existed, but it really doesn’t matter. The message of Jesus is still a Great Good whether such a man existed or not. If he did live, he was no more the son of God (aka the Force/Supreme creator/God) than the Roman soldier who hammered the nails into his hands on the cross. We’re all God’s sons and daughters. So if Jesus actually did live he was just a remarkable man of wisdom with great knowledge of God/The Force/the Supreme Creator. The resurrection and virgin birth were myths. If Jesus did live then the miracles done by Christ were “magic” that he performed to gain legitimacy for his message. Some speculate that during his “lost years” that he studied the mysteries in Egypt? Perhaps this is where he learned his knowledge? As I said above, this author tends not to believe that Jesus was a real person. There’s just no evidence to support it.
So then who wrote the New Testament? This question will probably never be answered. I believe some learned Greeks wrote the story of Christ for positive reasons. I believe Christ is an allegory for gaining a high state of consciences. Christ dying on the cross is a metaphor for the death of our lower, base, material self so that the higher spiritual self can ascend. This is the Gnostic Christian idea of attaining “Christ consciousness.” This is no different than the Hindu idea of discovering your Atman. You hammer your ego to the cross that your true spiritual self can arise. As far as eternal salvation, no one really knows what happens when we die. Since the universe tends to be cyclical, this author tends to believe that we too come back again in some form. The path to spiritual salvation is about finding your Christ consciousness wherever you find yourself and once you are at peace with yourself and the universe around you, then you are saved. Once your intentions are motivated purely by love, you’re saved. So Jesus is the way to salvation because being like Jesus is the way to salvation. It has nothing to do with saying some words about “accepting Christ as your savior” or taking part in dogmatic rituals.
I believe these learned Greeks probably intended on creating a spiritual movement based on hermetic and platonic ideas. I believe that once this faith started spreading, that certain powerful parties took notice. These parties probably decided that since they couldn’t stop the Christ movement, that they would capture it and take in the direction that they wanted. So this is when Paul came on the scene. Paul started pushing for organized churches. When Paul was Saul he persecuted Christians. But when Christianity started gaining steam, someone ordered Saul to become Paul in order to co-opt the teachings of Christ. Christianity became an organized religion and then merged with the Roman state. The organized Christian church maintained much of Christ’s teachings but then added the rules and sacraments to keep the people in line. You could live a life almost identical to Jesus but if you didn’t believe in taking “Holy Communion” you were “damned.”
But while the Church was an organization of oppression, superstition, and corruption there’s no doubt that the Catholic Church was critical in civilizing the West. Through its hierarchy the Church worked as a center of organization. It started institutions of learning and charitable entities. Monasteries and abbeys served their local communities. The town church had a social welfare role. When it comes down to it, the Catholic Church was the most influential organization in the history of the West. Later, the Protestants came along and enacted some needed reforms that led to increased literacy among the masses, but with them too we see witch burnings and tyrannical social controls. Overall though, Christianity did a lot to bring about the social and cultural unity of the White Western world. Most of what people called “Christendom” in say the year 1550, was what I today would call “White-dom.” Of course, today Christianity has lost much of its influence in the Western world.
Overall I have positive feelings towards Christianity but don’t care much for much of the dogmas of organized religion. This isn’t to say that I reject organized religion outright. I respect the Catholic and Orthodox denominations especially. I enjoy watching Catholic mass and Orthodox liturgy. I have great affection for Catholic and Orthodox Cathedrals and churches. If I had children I would send them to Catholic schools before I ever sent them to public schools. I grew up going to a mainline Protestant church and go to service on holidays when it is required of me by certain family members. I value a good sermon.
The only churches I feel uncomfortable in are the Evangelical churches with people holding their hands in the air, speaking in tongues, freaking out and damning people who don’t give their undying support to the state of Israel. I can’t stand the music in these churches or the dancing about (I like the old hymns, as they would have sang in Victorian England. OK I admit liking “Shout to the Lord” and “Awesome God.”). I consider the preaching of preachers like John Hagee to be black magic that does nothing but whip up people’s emotions. There’s no love in these sermons, as they’re usually just political or social screeds. If ever there were churches that were run by Lucifer himself, it’s these types. These churches only arose in the last 40 years and in this author’s opinion, are most likely the products of intelligence organizations? In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if in the future these churches totally rejected Christ outright and became Old Testament Churches that worshiped the Old Testament god and had for its Vatican the state of Israel. I don’t think the people who attend these churches are necessarily bad, I just find them to be spiritually and politically mislead. I believe the appeal that these churches have is in their political and social intertwinement. These churches make you feel like God is on your side politically and socially. The mainline Protestant churches tend to be politically liberal. So in America you have churches for the Right (Evangelical) and the Left (mainline protestant). The Catholic and Orthodox churches tend to be apolitical. This is another reason why I prefer the Catholic and Orthodox churches as institutions? There’s little to no politics.
Ok, this isn’t totally true; at least regarding covert politics. In the battle against the New World Order the Orthodox Church (outside the United States) has been a bulwark. The Catholic Church also has some strong elements that oppose the Anglo-America-Judeo-Illuminati-Elite (3). The mainline Protestants however are four-square in the NWO camp. The Evangelicals are behind the Jewish faction of the Anglo-American-Judeo-Illuminati-Elites, but do show some rhetorical opposition to the NWO (unless it’s the Jews running it, then I guess it’s OK with them?).
The one issue that all Christian churches fail on is the issue of White genocide (see page above titled “Program for White Genocide”). Not only do they remain silent on this massive injustice, but they take part in politics and activities that increases immigration into White countries. Even among conservative Evangelicals leaders you see support for so called “comprehensive immigration reform.” The White peoples of Christendom bled and died for the Christian faith but the Christian faith appears unwilling to fight for us? This is one of the reasons I’m disseminating ideas for a new religion for White people called the “White Path” (4). In this religion I include the archetype and teachings of Christ as the “son of god” Thor (with “god” meaning the All-Father Odin) (5). I take the best parts of Christianity (the teachings and archetype of Christ) and include them with a religion designed for the peoples of the White West. This new religion would be less necessary if the Churches would stand behind us in our struggle against White genocide. But unfortunately they don’t, and even claim that ethnic or racial exclusivity is against the idea of universal love that Christ preached for.
Of course, no-one is flooding Japan with non-Japanese and force-integrating these non-Japanese while claiming that the Japanese who oppose this are against universal love. And no one is flooding Israel with non-Jews and force integrating these non-Jews while claiming that the Jews who oppose this dynamic are people against universal love. This claim of lacking love isn’t directed at any non-White peoples. Only White people are accused of being against universal love for not wanting to be blended out of existence via forced integration (or for wanting spaces and institutions for themselves).
I see no reason why Whites would be any less capable of universal love for others while having spaces and institutions of our own? Certainly no one would argue that Jews aren’t able to love universally due to the existence of Israel or AIPAC? And no one would say that Africans are unable to love universally due to the existence of Nigeria, Zimbabwe or the NAACP? Only Whites are told that we’re not universal lovers for wanting spaces and institutions of our own. This is the dialectic of White genocide
Genocide (by forced diversity or any other method) is not universal love. People who deny White humans the same rights as other humans are not lovers, they’re haters. Pro-Whites have the moral high ground on this issue. I know of no one taken seriously within White Nationalism or among pro-Whites who seriously advocates denying spaces and institutions to non-Whites or even Jews? Pro-Whites are the true champions of freedom, choice, and community. If non-Whites and yes, even Jews support our rights, we will gladly do the same in return. Love between two people is based on mutual respect. Let us all live by the Golden Rule and do on to others, as we would wish done on to us. Just as humans thrive in families that they choose to form, let us not deny all humans the right to thrive in communities and nations that they choose to form. Much of the alienation that people report in modern life is caused from the loss of community. Diversity is a major cause in the loss of community in the United States (6). This is an issue that the Christian churches should stand behind us on for moral and practical reasons.
Christianity has a great message to offer, but there’s no reason to think that this message has to be in opposition to White freedom. I recommend that the churches start thinking about standing with pro-Whites on the issue of White genocide. The world is about the change greatly. Once matters are set-aright on this earth, you’re going to want to be known as among those who stood against White genocide. If you don’t, then don’t be surprised if the people of the West look to a new Path for their spiritual needs (7).
What Would Jesus Do? He would oppose White genocide.
(1) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/godthe-allthe-forcethe-uber-rotator/
(2) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2012/09/23/the-white-gods/
(3) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/characteristics-of-the-globalist-elites/
(4) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/the-white-path/
(5) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/09/08/the-gods-on-the-white-path/
(6) http://boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/04/the_downside_of_diversity/
(7) https://systemssymbols.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/the-white-path/
Systems and Symbols 
I think what you’re doing with the White Way is interesting, but I fear that it could easily evolve into something detrimental to Whites if greater care isn’t taken in encouraging a somewhat more aggressive and defensive position toward potential threats. In my opinion, we need something that has just the right balance between Talmudism and what you have proposed with the White Way.
SS editor: It’s the “White Path,” but I do like the sound of “White Way.” The first law of the White Path is the survival and amelioration of White humans. Talmudism is overly ethnocentric in that the out groups are nothing but animals. I don’t think that’s the route we want to go.
In the stories, Zeus wanted what was best for his people and he was very forceful and uncompromising about it. There’s nothing wrong with that, though it is often painted in a way that he viewed humans contemptuously, though perhaps he wasn’t unjustified, seeing how cynical and unreliable our people have become with one another in the White Genocide Crisis? Though I do wonder whether the Old Testament God lied about being the one who actually made the covenant with Abraham? If Abraham is unrelated to the ideology of the “Synagogue Of Satan,” it would rewrite everything we thought we knew about our enemies.
SS Editor: Like I said in the article, the old testament is a mix of old stories mixed with Jewish myths and tribal history. I’m trying to figure out Yahweh’s covenant with Abraham? I believe much of Genesis is about Zeus/Enlil but the covenant with Abraham may be the exception? If I recall Yahweh did require a sacrifice to begin the covenant? He also asked Abraham to kill his son. This seems contrary to Zeus’s ways, but does fit with Enki/Lucifer’s. So it might be that this story was actually referring to Enki/Lucifer, just as much of the other old testament stories do? I do however believe that most of Genesis refers to Zeus.
I’ve become of the personal belief that the mythology around Jesus was formed the way it is because that it was intended to be a strategic move toward an imperialistic ecumenical one world religion. People are going to hate me for writing this, but I think the real “Great Deception” is something so HUGE that it includes even Christianity as part of an elaborate master plan toward a New World Order and the Universal Brotherhood of Man (White Genocide.) This is evidenced in the fact that Jesus himself has magical exploits and associations of just about every known advanced being up to that point. I think this was because the Nicene Council thought they needed a figure that could function as an everyman who has all the different powers of all the pagan gods, to better unite all conquered peoples under the Roman Catholic Church. Rome basically became the New Babylon.
Here’s a video that does a theological comparison of Jesus with similar Pagan deities:
The crucifixion itself is loaded with all kinds of symbolism that has several secret meanings. One of these is the agricultural symbolism. Just look at the position scarecrows are kept in when a farmer puts them up in his field:
And there is an author who even makes the claim that Jesus was simply the Apotheosis of Titus Flavius, and that the Romans used it to pacify Judea via the use of ideological subversion.
SS Editor:I’ve watched the Ceasar’s Messiah documentary and listed to several interviews with the author and think he is on to something. But regardless of what the origins of the Jesus story are, I still think it has the potential for giving a positive state of mind.
More on that here:
http://caesarsmessiah.com/
In my opinion, The “Synagogue of Satan” mentioned in Revelations is none other than Vatican City in Rome. Romans even knew themselves as “Saturnians,” after their god, Saturn, who was the Roman God of Agriculture, Harvest, Time, Old Age, and also of Mortality and Restrictions. If you study real closely, you’ll even notice how they appear to use euphemistic words for transmutations (i.e. transubstantiation) ; yes…alchemy! And even more, is the fact that the ceremonial costume that the Pope wears actually resembles Dagon, the maligned Philistine God. The Pope isn’t so much a Man of God, as he is someone who seeks gold and the philosopher’s stone.
SS editor: Yes, but why include such a story (in Revelation) in the Catholic Bible if it refers to the Vatican? I’m sure there have been good Popes and bad Popes. You are correct about Catholicism being Saturniarn. This is why I believe the creation of the church probably included some shady elements. However, today I see some parties in the Church that oppose the NWO. Remember that an organization can be created for one purpose but then be taken over by other parties. I believe there’s a war going on in the Catholic Church that reflects the greater war between NWO elements and anti-NWO elements.
In my opinion, the Zionists, The Catholic Church (esp. Jesuits), and the Evangelical Churches are all working together toward the same end behind the scenes. Out of all of the denominations, I think the Mormons probably have the best track record of fighting for the empowerment of Whites; until recently when the federal govt. leaned on them to be more accepting of the unwanted Blacks and other non-Whites, whom are believed to be cursed by God in their version of events.
SS editor: Out of the three main groups you mention I think the Catholics have the most active anti-NWO elements. The Evangelicals sometimes talk about it, but go along with every war that the NWO wants.I think all their “End Times” talk is just to set the stage for the “great deception.” However, I think that the White Rabbit may be on to something when he points out that the Red Hippo may be at the top of the Anglo-Jewish-Masonic-Protestant side AND the Germanic-Nazi-Catholic side and just lets the two sides fight it out.They fight to determine what kind of NWO it will be.BUT, I think that after WWII that some Germans, along with some others, went “off the reservation” totally and told the Red Hippo to “stuff him self.” If this is true it might mean that they have a backer from off world? And with their leverage are methodically bringing the hammer down on the Red Hippo’s children on earth. Regarding the Mormons, I have a feeling that when the tide turns on the White genocide issue that the Moron prophets may “reinterpret” their changes related to race. In fact, Mormonism may be a “fall back position” if the Anglo-American-elites start going down hard.
I apologize to all of your readers if it seems like I’m being hard on Christianity. I’m sure there are a lot of people who work in these organizations who mean well, just like in the Freemasons at the lower levels.
SS Editor: I agree.
I do believe that the mythological characters that Christian Theology is based on, were likely real people though. I also believe that Christianity in the form everyone knows it today, is wordism of the worst kind. We often hear the saying that Heaven helps those who help themselves, but this isn’t what is taught. We are taught instead that we must rely on a set of words backed by authority figures, and just expect our problems to work themselves out through divine intervention, without our own participation in bringing it about. Think about that, everyone…
PS – Yes, the Gnostics had views on the subject that are very different to a modern Christian’s interpretation. Even some of their ideas can become something dangerous however. One such school in Gnosticism believes the radical position that physical matter itself is inherently evil and therefore should be destroyed. This doctrine basically amounts to nihilism. Then again, if I were forced to choose between living my life as the lab rat of the Demiurge (aka the God of this World who supports an NWO) and entering a permanent state of nothingness, I guess I’d have to choose joining the dark void of uncreated nothingness rather than suffer under the draconian dictatorship of the Red Hippo. I will also note that the Gnostics were not a single group with a monolithic ideology. They had fairly diverse views on spirituality.
SS editor: Yes, I think the matter = evil argument is wrong. The whole universe is a part of God, including matter.I’m not advocating Christian Gnosticism, I just like their interpretation of Jesus.
I read your notes. Some of my intentions were probably unclear in parts. What I meant to say in that part about Talmudism, was something to the effect of achieving a healthy temperance between the two. And you’re right, Talmudism in its purest form is too severe. Historically, the ideology has been almost as dangerous to its own practitioners as the people they were directing their hateful energy against. Our enemy places a much greater priority in destroying other people than preserving their own. I’m not saying that we necessarily have to view other people as animals, I’m just very worried about our people becoming soft again. I think it would be a disaster if this were allowed to happen again.
Yes, the Catholics are a mixed bag. I think at the top, they are pretty certainly in favor of the NWO. It’s possible that some Popes were against it too, but I can’t be sure. If any of them were pro-White, I’d bet the one who backed Hitler probably was. Since Vatican II, the Catholics have become more and more Anti-White through the decades. Some people even suspected that the real Pope at that time was abducted by Freemasons & Commies and was replaced with a double who looked like him, so they could make changes from within and subvert the Church. I think I read somewhere that there are actually two or three different unofficial Popes who have parted from the Catholic Church since Vatican II, who have tiny followings and aren’t very influential. I forgot the smaller details of it, but that’s the basic synopsis on it.
SS Editor: I don’t know if the Pope that backed Hitler was necessarily “pro-White,” I just think the Church saw their interests as being closer to the Germans than the materialistic forces opposed to them.
I agree that much of Genesis seems to be about Zeus’s work on Earth. One of the things that got me fuming when I read the Book of Enki, was how Enlil was billed as being Abraham’s Master; ergo implying that he would be the Red Hippo. It’s entirely possible that Enki’s priests were making that up, as he has been called the “Father of Lies.” I have to admit though, that it isn’t that hard to imagine Enlil in such a position, since he is usually portrayed very negatively in the legends. So it’s very easy to assume that the horror stories about the Devil are simply victor’s propaganda. Enki being on the losing side, and therefore “evil.”
SS Editor: Again, with regards to Genesis all we can do is speculate. Whether the current landlord of earth is named Enki or Enlil is irrelevant. What matters is someone tried to wipe Whites of the earth. I tend to believe the “Red Hippo” to be Lucifer/Enki because the globalist elites tend to be favorable to him. It could be that Enlil made the covenant with Abraham? As I wrote several times, the old testament is old stories that certain groups made their own.It appears that Enlil was displeased with those he made this covenant with since he chose to flood them to death. One of the most fascinating speculations I heard about Noah’s ark was that it was a spaceship and that this spaceship could be the moon!? My biggest piece of evidence pointing towards Lucifer/Enki being the Red Hippo is that the globalist elites are so favorable to him.So my official position at this time is that Enki/Lucifer is the Red Hippo, is here on earth, and is responsible for ordering White genocide. Furthermore I believe Enlil/Zeus to be coming back to earth, which is making the current globalist elites rather concerned.The open question is what Zeus coming to earth will be like? He’s the “devil we don’t know” that, due to my faith in Whiteness, I expect to be on our side. In fact, this is a part of my invented religion’s (the White Path) belief system and eschatology. Of course, I always accept the chance that I could be wrong. Perhaps whatever’s coming here 100 times worse than what’s here? If so, it still doesn’t explain why the globalist elites are so eager to inflict genocide on Whites? It seems like it would have smarter to build Whites up to fight this returning force? Unless, whatever coming here is the Father of Whites?The All-Father.
And indeed, why include such a book as Revelations? My guess would be that it was intended to test our skills at taking verbal instruction. We keep hearing the Freemasons tell us that the world will be a better place for those who are “observant.” It brings to mind a trick test I had in high school, where the assignment wasn’t really the assignment. We were told to read all the instructions before starting on it. The last question was located on the back of the handout and read: “do not fill out any of the blanks and sign your name and turn in paper.” And that was the test. While I don’t know that this is what is really going on, it is the best theory I have for it being in there.
SS Editor: Could you show me where the Freemasons said that? Sounds interesting?
This whole thing might simply be the Devil’s job. It might not be anything personal at all. Or it could simply be a concession that Satan was required by Zeus to make. I guess it could be kinda like the movie Saw, where Jigsaw tells his successors, that the game must have a way out, or it is against the laws of Heaven?
SS editor: I think there may be someone to this? This world may all be test for Zeus to see what kind of people we are? Perhaps Zeus sent the last flood because the Devil succeeded in ruining that stock? Perhaps when he returns, he assess the quality of the stock and if it’s too corrupted, he wipes it out and starts anew? The so called “Devil” (Enki/Lucifer) is his agent, just as Black Peter is for Santa Claus.
SS editor:As always I thank you for your replies. I do sense a slight preference for Enki/Lucifer in you, but your comments are always welcome.
It seems to me to you are going around “harvery’s barn” to borrow from Farrell. Isn’t it much more direct to assume that Jesus existed and the resurrection happened followed by the same old crew infecting? Why do you suppose the jews still hate him? Why talk about Zeus, or the devil, as if they are real, but nothing real happened 2000yrs ago? Why were Europeans, whites, and only Europeans accepting of Christ?
I’m not good at discussing all this and I know nothing about the gnostics. I know that there is a serious problem with “christianty.” I agree that Jesus would oppose genocide.
SS: I don’t know what you mean by “direct?” I don’t believe in the literal resurrection of Jesus because I don’t believe that people can be resurrected three days after death. I am willing to consider the possibility of Jesus living as a man or of some learned people creating the Jesus story for good reasons, with “the same old crew” infecting it afterwards. Many Jews dislike Jesus for a number of reasons, to name a few 1)The new testament makes Jews look pretty bad, 2) Christianity is a universalist religion that threatens the existence of the Jews, 3) Historically Christians have seen Jews as an enemy. I consider the possibility of Zeus and Lucifer being real because these same archetypes pop up across the mythologies of many cultures. But if they do or did exist as living beings, I don’t see them as “Gods” but instead as extraterrestrials or advanced beings (gods). So Zeus doesn’t throw lightening bolts with is hands, instead he shoots them from advanced weapons. The ancients who heard about these stories used language that they understood. If you want to read more about the “the gods” (Zeus,Lucifer, Thor) here’s some links below on my thoughts regarding them. The biggest problem with “christianty” is that it’s spelled wrong.
oh good grief! christianIty then
I meant direct in the sense of simplest explanation. No, people aren’t ressurrected in three days. I think you are begging the question.
SS: The simplest explanation doesn’t interest me. Unless it best explains whatever question I need explanation for. What question am I begging?
Ok! I don’t care to argue because too much is unknown and I think whatever is true can stand on it’s own. The question though, that I think you are begging is whether Jesus existed or not. You assume that he did not because nothing extrordinary ever happens. Goes in a circle. I have a hard time thinking that wise Greeks made him up to inspire us.
SS: At this point, Jesus only exists (in my opinion) as an archetype to look towards as a model to live like (charitable, non-judgmental, caring).Too me it doesn’t matter if he existed, or if he did, as just a man, and not the “son of God.” His message is a good one. It’s not flawless, but it’s very good.The reason I say it was “wise Greeks” was because the new testament was written in Greek.